how thick were thoughs jockeys...

AW racing is a total fcking nonsense.  How anybody can watch it and keep a straight face is beyond me.

Shirley, those jockeys thought wrongly, though I may be wrong...

Adam very unlucky to miss the break AGAIN

I bet most of those thick jockeys can spell "those".

hmmmm. massive typo in the thread title does little for the credibility of this opinion...

He'll have to go for a LAY down until he recovers.

Mind you the thick ones are us lot backing on it. Need to be a picture on the wall in the weighing room, with look out eyes.

Another Simon Holt nightmare?

Free on the way to the start. Free in the race. She's hardly keep it up.

yes my spelling is afool agreed.

















































awful

wasnt the the winner the only horse in ANY in the race , quite simply the best horse, got the best ride, and won easily.

form

Exactly which horses were entitled to not let it go clear on form,look at the result 50/1 and 66/1 second and third have you ever thought they were just absolutely useless thats why it won.

exactly kenco, I'm sure if the winner was held up for a run he'd have hosed up too.

yes i reckon if the winner was 30 lengths back would have still won.

You wouldn't mind taking on that winner off new mark.

the fav was 30 lengths back,but that didnt win

To sum up---A true run race for a change,no slow, slow,then quicken down the hill,as normally happens.

mediocre contest been analysed to death by Chapman, good chance the best horse won.

cannot see why her handicap should alter 2nd and 3rd will be only rated in the mid forties...........quite simply running too its mark of sixty was more than enough......think she will be packed of to stud now though ,being a half sister to a 2000gns winner.

'those'

ydc

Looked a straight enough race to me with all handbrakes off

larry don his cobblers..