|
By:
I have every confidence that Eddie will clear his name.
|
|
By:
too right he will .. charge people with no eveidence wouldent happen to jocks in ireland
|
|
By:
A question, which bookmaker was consistently the best price for this horse throughout the day ?
|
|
By:
Sounds like you know the answer already MOTS
It would be hoped Eddie "vigorously defends" these charges with rather more effort than he put into the rides in question. |
|
By:
his missis is fit though!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
would that be laddies, mots
|
|
By:
Not PP they refund the money if its not fair......
|
|
By:
I think they will find it difficult to make the charge stick looking at the race itself - wore first time blinkers - went off quickly from the front - not an easy case to prove if that is all you have got .......
|
|
By:
The horse in question has done much the same thing in all of it's last 12 starts.
It was off Jan. to July 2011,ran the same way (dif jockey) and hasn't run since. Any Barrister who can read the form will make mincemeat of the allegation. As to providing inside information,that's another can of worms. |
|
By:
if anything like the other cases they will have communication between jockey before race with layers then some kind of reward for jockey at some point after
![]() |
|
By:
Depends on the evidence I guess. They might have tape recordings of a plot or something.
|
|
By:
The big shock in this is he only has 5 cases to answer
|
|
By:
they prob know its more cases but only have clear evidence on 5
|