why o why did buick

and as usual kh un t head hughes does me

buick is riding really well at the moment, but he lost the horse the race there lost ground trying to get position imo

to be fair he never would of got a gap through the field...only option to go round imo....

he was positive and made things happen,a good run for mine.

Crowley on the runner up behind Morrisons was hideous.Going as well as winner a furlong and a half out but Moore goes for a run and Crowley sits,sits,sits and then some more.Pulls out having given the winner 6 lengths and gets beaten just over a length.

if buick had sat another 50yds b4 making move and came more up centre the gap was there eventually...poss grp horse in h'cap??....pocket talking dissapointment but really thought he was coming to win....maybe angle encourages optimism thats unfounded

who knows but I prefer jockeys to have a go rather than sit and suffer.

lots of hard luck stories from horses trying to come through a wall of horses in the middle.

the gaps only opened coming in to the final furlong.

he was positive and made things happen

why oh why, when posting on a forum, or writing to points of view, or in letters to local newspapers, do people feel the need to insert an extra "oh why"? "Why did Buick go to the far side?" conveys identical meaning and will solicit identical response, (this one excepted).