Are RUK pictures more delayed than normal?

haydock in particular?

NO.....turf slowed down by about half a second though and more track players less liquidity....ruk now .3sec behind turf about 1.7sec behind live

haydock has played funny tbf....but noting andyl there all seems as normal...

haydock v hard

All 3 tracks for me.  I don't know what's going on - seems like there's liquidity andy but the prices disappear earlier.

The winner of the 5.05 at Wetherby is already back home having his tea.

bilbo its getting harder thats for sure i agree with you

Can't say I've noticed much difference. Marginally slower if anything.

BF Video has been fractionally slower today.

I always compare the clock on ATR with the BF Video clock and try to get 4 secs ahead of ATR, but today it has been a struggle to get it 3.5 secs ahead.

Haydock brutal again today

York well behind as well. Pics def slower. Will need to start playing without the hands tied behind the back now.

lack of liquidity and delay is the reason why it looks "brutal"

track players killing the game

turf slowed down to attract the track players,the racecourses are obviously makeing good money from the track players who seem to need the quicker pics.

It looks brutal because of the increased numbers going to the tracks.

RUK TRACKS now have increased track playing business because of the slower pics off course.

No probs here. Was thinking it was easy today

turf tv have moved stidio and therefore now have a longer delay which needs sorting cause players from the shops are dropping like flys....
in couple yrs 4g will be fired up in the uk and there will be lots more track players in the stands on there ipads on super fast internet   so game has only 2 yrs left at most !!!!!