There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
oops 
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
oh dear
learn the angles simon |
|
By:
to be fair not many would have disagreed
|
|
By:
Photo carnage
People relying on commentator, more than their eyes |
|
By:
cue cut across backers coming on here blaming holt for it getting beat!!!
|
|
By:
i honestly thought Ginzan had got it,was amazed he called that tbh
|
|
By:
eyes didnt tell a different story, not many takers at fancy prices
|
|
By:
poppydog
but my eyes told me that cut across had won!! |
|
By:
ots, how much did you make in the photo?
|
|
By:
duffy,dont have to have a bet to form an opinion,do you?
|
|
By:
no you don't but in a photo where the one you think has won is trading at almost double figure prices it is probably prudent to back it.
 |
|
By:
duffy - there are more after timers on here than down my local - onthesnaff is one of many muppets who love putting the boot in on here after the event - does your nut in.
|
|
By:
^
fair point |
|
By:
I also thought Ginzan had won, but I only put 10 euro on him in the photo betting.
|
|
By:
poor yorkie done his conkers on cut across,unlucky fella.
|
|
By:
poor yorkie done his conkers on cut across,unlucky fella.
|
|
By:
fair enough river, what's probably happened to many is that they thought ginzan had won but doubted themselves when the prices appeared on the photo....and are subsequently kicking themselves!!!
|
|
By:
duffy appears a tad upset too
|
|
By:
nice one snaff, i don't usually get into an argument on here but i must say....you say you thought ginzan had won but didn't back him at around 10's for free money....and on the other thread about this you are calling people thickets
|
|
By:
Look up the word irony duffy then do a bit of research on the forumite Chompy_imo.
You're not the brightest,are ye? |
|
By:
makes no difference snaff, you said you thought it had won but did not back it!!, you are not being ironic.
|
|
By:
Chompy still awaiting his tv call-up.
|