|
By:
System working well. Please send more money.
Try this; http://www.geegeez.co.uk/category/horse-racing-systems/ |
|
By:
Nick Mordin is your man, he is the Systems Analyst for the Weekender and has been looking at systems and their returns for years.
Try to get your hands on as many old copies of the Weekender as you can, imo. |
|
By:
Chuck your systems in the bin, Form analysis and Speed figures are the way to go!
|
|
By:
system is often a dirty word on here...
surely knowing your trainers behaviour is a system , form analysis is fine but knowing when the horses are there to do their best is often more important! |
|
By:
Always get your haircut twice a week and never hunt south of The Thames.
Worked for me. |
|
By:
There's millions of them. You might as well do your dissertation on 'people' and 'what kind of lives they have'.
Perhaps what you might study is the range of strategies that purveyors of sytems adopt to get punters to subscribe to them. You could investigate the phenomenon of 'Tommo' and how he's managed to get where he has. He is regarded, by some, as the 'face' of racing. He has his own tipping line(s). |
|
By:
a lot of people make the mistake of back dating systems to fit certain criteria that can't be reasoned with logic. most of these trends will balance out in time.
|
|
By:
I'm sure Hugh Taylor has revealed plenty of his well researched systems down the years too -
eg Backing all American breds on their first starts at Southwell He can be contacted through the formfactor@attheraces.com |
|
By:
Thanks for the responses so far.
I will try to get in contact with Nick Mordin and check out that site, thank you! I personally loath people charging for these systems and eBooks etc and I have even found a video on people explaining how easy it is to do on Youtube, ridiculous! And to SR, I would not consider using these in my betting! I am a huge advocate of Form Study, I love it! But taking the 'opinion' and personal opinion out of form means it is easier to study mathematically! |
|
By:
form is all well and good mate we can all see whats there in the book can't we.
stats that indicate long running trainer biases in the way they operate though can help determine when the horse is there to do its best and when its there as part of a longer term plan with the trainer. thats a system but based on trainers individual traits not a blanket back blah balh in blah balh races if blah blah. |
|
By:
a lot don't like the word 'system' as they think of ridiculous little blanket ways of betting.
|
|
By:
I understand it it s controversial topic/way of betting and as I mentioned it is not one I would use, but doing it like this means I have the opportunity to do my dissertation on racing, and that will get me through it!
But basically I am just looking for systems with a final positive return over the long period so that I can do a pannel data regression on the return on government bonds. |
|
By:
But surely you're screwing your returns before you start. The only way to choose a system that you know will have a final positive return over the long period, is to pick one from past results, but 'the long period' will be a period in the past. It is extremely easy to invent a system that shows a profit on past results.
|
|
By:
do you think anyone is likely to tell you of a profitable system ?
|
|
By:
That is what I am wary of Striding, hence the mention of being cheeky, but I am hardly planning to stake all of my student budget on it and I can make sure the final copy will not be made publicly available.
With regards to the viability of the systems I am not fussed, all I want is one with positive returns using past data. |
|
By:
system is often a dirty word on here...
|
|
By:
You have just made me feel ill
...- as - I well remember this Thread from when it was First Posted = 11 years ago .... I would have said - about 3 years ago, or 4 at the most. ![]() |
|
By:
OL = dementia
|