Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Al2010
14 Apr 12 22:31
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Feb 09
| Topic/replies: 118 | Blogger: Al2010's blog
Reduce field to max 30 runners. Common sense to me. Don't see many, if any, fatalities in the Foxhunters, Topham, races in Oct/Nov. Sadly common sense seems to be lacking in this day and age.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 5
By:
zilzal1
When: 14 Apr 12 22:32
Theres a short run to the 1st there for a start
By:
Al2010
When: 14 Apr 12 22:37
How many fatalities at the first though...? If you have 40 runners in a marathon all running in confined space, one will naturally bring down another or cause them to have less room to spot any obstacles. If you have 30, more space, more time to react. They need to do something and i'd be surprised if this wasn't the answer.
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Apr 12 22:44
How many horses by Sychronised when he fell? 0
How many horses left in the race when ATP was bought down? About 20

Crazy
By:
Al2010
When: 14 Apr 12 22:55
Which would then mean that 10 instead of 20 would've fell/PU/BD/refused. I don't quite think there is any common sense in your reply? Naturally there will be 39 after first horse fell and 38 after second and so on....
By:
Pleasegivemeanailedontip
When: 14 Apr 12 23:14
Simply pointing out that there are fatal accidents in the national even when the field is reduced to 20. Ergo, the problem is not how many runners there are.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com