There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Disgrace..still 17 runners, wide open, the fav was 8/1 and not 9/4..why?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
Theres a CHART that they go by & THATS THAT!
|
|
By:
But there was no guarantee he would of gone of fav..never mind.
|
|
By:
It surrounds the "price" at withdrawal M8
|
|
By:
The whole market for that race is sick 16 runner wide open race all the market us tight around 6to 10 -1 bookies didnt have to take a penny for anything this morning because of the non runners as usual punters get screwed and scum win with their robbery ..
|
|
By:
corals rule 4 this morning worked out at 60p for 1 horse and 50p for the other. how they can get away with this is beyond me.
|
|
By:
Fred Rule 4 50p for both PW horses. Books should allow customers the option of a R4 at advertised prices during guarantee period.
Also, I note number of N/Rs in race and expect another to come out. Contrast with Cheltenham where connections aren't easily influenced to pull out horses. Also, books are having it both ways about the time of a Rule 4. If a subsequent NR's price doesn't qualify for Rule 4 when the bet is placed, but then shortens (as they do) to a price that does qualify, before it is withdrawn, then Rule 4 is calculated on the price at the time the horse was withdrawn. Alternatively, if a subsequent NR's price does qualify for a Rule 4 when the bet is placed, but then lengthens to a price that does not qualify, then the Rule 4 is calculated at the price when bet the was placed. I don't mind one or the other but I strongly object to both. |