Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
egner
17 Oct 11 20:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Jan 07
| Topic/replies: 13,526 | Blogger: egner's blog
http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/NEWS/news_horse/ALL/2431//

shocking.Cry

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 43
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:26
McCoy, the Grand National winning, 16-time champion jump jockey, added: ‘The Professional Jockeys Association has worked closely with the Authority on the BHA review and I hope my colleagues will embrace the  proposed changes as they are in the best interest of the sport. I, for one, support the changes.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/racing/article-2042321/Frankie-Dettori-AP-McCoy-BHA-whip-rules.html#ixzz1b4KJJEe0
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:26
Dettori, who was banned for nine days for hitting Rewilding 24 times in the last two furlongs when he won the Prince of Wales’s Stakes at Royal Ascot in June, said: ‘I am not proud of having fallen foul of the whip rules in the past but I have never harmed a horse. These new rules are easy to understand which will help jockeys ride within them.
‘I accept these new rules are in the best interest of our great sport.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/racing/article-2042321/Frankie-Dettori-AP-McCoy-BHA-whip-rules.html#ixzz1b4L3ex2j
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:30
Sir Henry Cecil, 10-times champion Flat trainer, added: "The BHA has done an excellent, thorough job with their review and I welcome these changes, which will hopefully serve British Racing well."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/horseracing/8791294/Frankie-Dettori-welcomes-BHAs-new-rules-on-jockey-whip-usage.html
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:30
Paul Nicholls, champion jumps trainer for the last six years, said: "Whilst I've been a critic of the rules in the past, nobody likes seeing misuse of the whip and I agree that the time had come when something had to be done.

"I am pleased that the BHA has made sensible and reasonable changes, and I am supportive of them."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/horseracing/8791294/Frankie-Dettori-welcomes-BHAs-new-rules-on-jockey-whip-usage.html
By:
ranader
When: 17 Oct 11 20:37
Oh my god what a mess. Old whip rules should be re instated with immediate effect untill a sensible compromise can be reached .


Paul Nicholls on Twitter
By:
ranader
When: 17 Oct 11 20:41
TONY MCCOY HITS OUT AT NEW WHIP RULES

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2011/oct/11/tony-mccoy-whip-rules
By:
Stake & Chips
When: 17 Oct 11 20:44
...but through all of this you have never stopped betting on it renge... Confused
By:
ranader
When: 17 Oct 11 20:44
Frankie Dettori admits new whip rules 'very hard' to follow for jockeys


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/horse_racing/15254324.stm
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:48
....no Stake...i havnt.....before betfair i knew nothing about horseracing...still dont really...am a maths guy/trader as i have stated before....

but now that the bandwagon is rolling I would like my opinion known....i am in favour of a whip ban...

...and given the utter lack of respect that some of the jockeys have shown towards the old rules the least they can do is persevere with the new ones.
By:
jmc27
When: 17 Oct 11 20:48
The Stewards held an enquiry to consider why D E Mullins, the rider of RASPBARY, which fell at the eleventh, had continued in the race when his horse appeared to be exhausted. They interviewed the rider, accompanied by Seamus Mullins, the trainer, and the racecourse Veterinary Surgeon, Mr Chris Jinnett, who was stationed at the tenth fence, and who observed that the gelding appeared tired on jumping the tenth. Having heard their evidence and viewed recordings of the race the Stewards found the rider in breach of Rule (D)45.3 and suspended him for eight days, on dates to be notified.
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:50
so ranader........with the apparent contradictions and backtracking of racings great and good.....

..where does the truth lay...?????!!!!
By:
Stake & Chips
When: 17 Oct 11 20:55
Not sure they should persevere with the new rules, when it is clear they are fundamentally flawed...
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 20:59
...the jockeys flouted the old rules Stake.......

..and they are either flouting or cant cope with these.....

so what is to be done ????????

..wouldnt it be simpler all round for a total ban of the whip????????
By:
Stake & Chips
When: 17 Oct 11 21:03
Jockeys should get severe punishments if it is demonstrated that they have abused a horse. Stewards need to play a role here. 6 month bans should be dolled out, 3 strikes and a life ban from the sport.

These new whip rules are a sledgehammer to crack a nut, and worst of all they are unfair, and unworkable.
By:
quay_street
When: 17 Oct 11 21:07
Fine egner. Let's ban it...

Now let's cull the horse population for those that are quirky because they won't give their best running without the whip. How many do you think that could be? A couple of thousand? They're good for nothing now...no owner will want them.

It will take a while, but the form book will then reflect their true ability accurately.

If we cannot have winners one way, then we can do it by natural selection. Survival of the most genuine. As an owner I am damned if I am going to pay good brass to have a horse playing up out the back of the field or pulling himself when he gets in front. In that state, he is not reliable to bet on...

So go on, let's ban the whip totally.
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 21:10
...quay street....

..is it beyond the wit of man.......in this "modern" age......to train a horse to run to its true potential without using a whip..?????
By:
ranader
When: 17 Oct 11 21:11
egner

we can ignore there earlier quotes made before the regulations came in

Now realise what a mess it is they have clearly changed their minds...
By:
quay_street
When: 17 Oct 11 21:16
I am not a charity and I will not take a risk on an expensive animal at a sale.

If the animal is not straightforward and given the whip is no longer an option, then I don't want to know about it. Let the tree-huggers look after it.

Also if it comes from a stallion that is known for quirky animals, then I reckon that stallion will be no longer used for breeding.

Natural and genetic selection of only the most straightforward.
By:
Stake & Chips
When: 17 Oct 11 21:19
Take away the whip completely and horses will still be killed in action on the racecourse. If you take your arguments to their logical conclusion, then you should stop betting on horses with immediate effect imo...
By:
egner
When: 17 Oct 11 21:20
fair enough quay street.....

i know nothing of ownership....or the machinations of traning......

but heres a thought......perhaps its the "qurky" ones that have the most untapped potential...and maybe a little patience and a bit of increased financial risk may reap greater rewards in the long term...

..i guess the retort is that such an idealistic view is easy when im not putting the cash in !!!!!!
By:
Rider
When: 17 Oct 11 21:21
monty roberts once said on C4 that the whip should be banned, funnily enough he did things with horses that surprised many people too
By:
dustybin
When: 18 Oct 11 10:54
What happens if the people that already regularly bet on (or invest in) racing decide that the issues of integrity are further put into question as a result of the new rules and stop, just on the basis of allegations of the ambiguous term 'public perception'?

Pandering to people who may never even bet could imo bring the already 'in danger' sport to its knees.

There has been no firm evidence put forward that backs up the rhetoric that 'everybody' had a problem with the whip, the 'whip' that had already gone through significant research and development.

There has been a lot of scaremongering over a minority of cases, educating the public would have been the major issue for me, along with better scrutiny and punishment of 'over use'.
By:
dustybin
When: 18 Oct 11 10:58
Just to clarify, 'pandering to people who may never bet'...ofc you dont have to bet on racing to have an opinion on welfare, but in all too many cases the 'whip' is a stereotype and the questions have been loaded with negative connotations, people who know nothing of the game assume things that arnt necessarily true
By:
dustybin
When: 18 Oct 11 11:00
asking people what they think of the whip is like asking somebody what they think of dogsh1t
By:
Dr Gonzo
When: 18 Oct 11 11:32
just my opinion probably everyone else diagrees

I disagree because I don't see how you link Rewilding's PoW run to it breaking it's leg in the KG
By:
salmon spray
When: 18 Oct 11 11:39
Yes watchit that is rubbish. Imo of course. Rewilding I agree was given a shockingly hard race at Royal Ascot for which Dettori was rightly banned under the old rules but I can`t see what that had to do with him breaking a leg next time out.
The Mark Johnston trained Cockney never ran as a 2-y-o. It may have been given a hard race at some time but again it broke down fatally before the home turn.
Cape Blanco is a 4-y-o entire who has won several Grp1s and been retired to stud. Hardly unusual.
If you were fishing I have obviously swallowed it hook line and sinker.
By:
pedrobob
When: 18 Oct 11 11:57
does not watchit have a point? for all we know, Rewilding was telling Dettori he was hurting and had done enough in the Prince OF Wales, but Dettori kept asking for more by using the whip. The horse responded but with possible consequences for when he was next put under maximum pressure?

Fractures, tendon and ligament strains, heart attacks etc do not neccessarily occur because of a single incident. Is it not more likey that most will be caused by constant exertion, wear and tear, pressure being applied until you reach the straw that broke the camel's back?
By:
salmon spray
When: 18 Oct 11 11:58
You a vet pedrobob ?
By:
pedrobob
When: 18 Oct 11 12:16
no salmon, just applying own experience of injuries suffered in a variety of sports, and making assumption that would not be much different physiologically for equines.

Would this not be your own experience?

Easy in hindsight, but you can look at the last year of Best Mate's life, and see that his defeat at Leopardstown to Beef Or Salmon, where he was nowhere near his best, was a portent of what was to come. He missed the Gold Cup 3 months later and was not seen on a racecourse until his sad death the following November as a 10yo. Would hold the view that his heart attack was not a sudden reaction, but possibly a build up of issues developing over the previous 12 months.
By:
salmon spray
When: 18 Oct 11 12:19
I suppose the Best Mate scenario is plausible,though I strongly suspect a vet found nothing wrong with him. The Rewilding one is stetching things a bit imo.
By:
pedrobob
When: 18 Oct 11 12:25
Rewilding suffered a leg fracture did he not? Would it not be possible that a hairline fracture originated in the Prince OF Wales, gradually worsened ( or at least did not improve or heal) in subsequent training and finally snapped under maximum pressure in the King George?
By:
salmon spray
When: 18 Oct 11 12:29
Possible of course,but such an injury could start on the gallops I would have thought.
Most horses who break legs on the flat have not had VERY hard races previously.
By:
pedrobob
When: 18 Oct 11 12:35
agree with your comments re most injuries starting on gallops, especially with the flat horses starting training as ungrown 1 and a bit year old weaklings whose bones will not be properly developed until they are at least 4.

Just pointing out that in the case of Rewilding, he obviously had a hard race in the PRince Of Wales, and it's possible that the horse was feeling it and had done enough, but the jockey decided otherwise. Every jockey would pull up if they felt something was clearly wrong with their mount and not at all suggesting that Dettori knew anything was amiss - likely that this horse was very game (which think many are) and ran through the pain when asked.
By:
the dealer
When: 18 Oct 11 12:36
pedrobob 18 Oct 11 12:25
Rewilding suffered a leg fracture did he not? Would it not be possible that a hairline fracture originated in the Prince OF Wales, gradually worsened ( or at least did not improve or heal) in subsequent training and finally snapped under maximum pressure in the King George?


with all the care and vetinary attention they get would find this scenario impossible to accept. you seem to be saying no one might have noticed this, despite the care they receive daily.

do you relly believe this would have been allowed to happen.

i find your statement completely without substance, apart from the FACT the horse suffered a leg fracture, which could have happened at any time. to suggest in a stable like this, the horse wouldnt have shown any symptons of this while in training is fantasy in my opinion.
By:
pedrobob
When: 18 Oct 11 12:40
as previously suggested, the fracture could have been so hairline that the horse stood training without displaying any obvious lameness at home. So not suggesting that Godolphin were in any way negligent in their care of the horse.

Horses are not asked for max pressure at home (are they?), so possible that it was only in the King George that the problem surfaced? If I remember, he had barely come off the bridle when the break happened, so had yet to be even asked for maximum effort in the race itself.
By:
xmoneyx
When: 18 Oct 11 12:47
out of 5

how painful is it for horse being whipped?

thx
By:
the dealer
When: 18 Oct 11 12:47
sorry pedro, its all about opinions but i really cant have that scenario in rewilding case. like you i am not a vet or have i worked in a stable but this is a million to one shot for me and bears no relevance to the whip debate.

the whip issue had to be looked at, the punishment has to fit the crime, the rules have to be workable, which the new rules clearly arent.

good luck today
By:
Blackrock
When: 18 Oct 11 12:49
Agree completely with Dustybin. The word whip conjures up thoughts of torture etc. If it were called an incentiviser, the public wouldnt care less about it. Same object just different name, and all would be fine.[;)]
By:
buddeliea
When: 18 Oct 11 12:52
Well this is going to run and run.
The only 2 ways it can ever stop imo is for racing to say stuff the whip objectors and do what we want,or ban hitting horses with it completely and just have it for steering purposes.
As we now live in a society that hates any sort of abuse of animals i suspect the 2nd option is the best way of ending this debacle.
Not really my take on it,but it is clear that something drastic now needs to be done for racing to continue in this country now,and for the future.
However this is decided is clearly not going to please everyone,thats life,but the main thing in this day and age is for racing to be seen to be putting horses first,whether we like it or not.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com