Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Mr Eboue
17 Oct 11 19:04
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Sep 09
| Topic/replies: 26,470 | Blogger: Mr Eboue's blog
The British Horseracing Authority (BHA) is failing to crack down on "non-triers", according to a leading analyst of the sport.

Timeform's Chasers & Hurdlers annual claims cheating is rife in jump racing, with stewards "blind" to the practice in which jockeys deliberately limit their horses' chances.

Sources within the BHA said it was "disappointed" by the allegations.

It comes after a week of controversy surrounding rules on whip use.

Every horse which ran under National Hunt rules during the 2010-11 season receives a report and rating in the guide - its latest edition running to 1,112 pages.

While saying the latest season "produced a group of outstanding champions" including "tip-top young chaser" Long Run, Timeform's verdict on some other performances is more damning.

It declines to name names, but says: "The rules requiring horses to be ridden on their merits are regularly flouted, and transgressions in the jumping game... are arguably as widespread now as they have been for a long time.

"Non-triers are rarely picked up by the racecourse stewards... who seem blind to such things

"The main responsibility for seeing that punters are not short-changed rests with the stewards, who must be seen to be imposing the rules with firmness and consistency.

"At times nowadays, at some of the more far-flung outposts of jump racing, it seems as if they are hardly imposing them at all."

The BHA is racing's regulator and is already facing a series of crises, most recently over the use of the whip, but also regarding its funding and the yet-to-be-published 2012 fixture list.

Starting this week four jockeys and one ex-professional rider face hearings for alleged corrupt practices, but all are from Flat racing, and not the jumping world at the centre of the allegations.

A spokesman for the BHA said it could not immediately comment.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
By:
bix
When: 17 Oct 11 19:15
Sources within the BHA said it was "disappointed" by the allegations.

Is that disapointed because some people think there are non triers or disapointed because people think the BHA does nothing about it.
By:
mightymoyes
When: 17 Oct 11 19:21
disappointed cos they dont want anyone talking about it.
By:
salmon spray
When: 17 Oct 11 19:24
Disappointed because they had to hire a consultant to find out what the general public and animal welfare groups considered to be a non-trier.
By:
bix
When: 17 Oct 11 21:42
Disappointed because they had to hire a consultant to find out what a non trier was.
By:
ilikewavingatbuses
When: 17 Oct 11 21:44
disappointed!
By:
Apologist
When: 17 Oct 11 21:45
Jump racing back at Wolverhampton then?


Now that is the home of blind stewards.
By:
Koo....
When: 17 Oct 11 22:08
disappointed timeform mentioned it this year when they'd seen it happening years ago
By:
dan hardcore
When: 17 Oct 11 22:51
Well done timeform. It's so obvious which ones to watch it should be a piece of piss for the stewards. They managed to find a Reg Hollinshead one last season though - absolutely sick really!!!
By:
kevo
When: 17 Oct 11 22:57
Unfortunately the BHA are only focusing on triers at the moment, six cracks with the whip in the last furlong and you're banned.
By:
capewine
When: 17 Oct 11 23:11
Paul Roy owns horses with Tabor. I couldn't make it up.
By:
dan hardcore
When: 17 Oct 11 23:31
Lost in the moment - an absolute classic!!!
By:
dan hardcore
When: 17 Oct 11 23:33
Remember laying that at newbury, wish i'd watched the goodwood run now.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com