There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
13 Oct 11
17:35
Joined:
Date Joined:
11 Jan 03
I'm sure it was, but it's about time the bookies refiunded stakes on these non-runners ...2nd one ive backed in a fortnight. All it means is I won't bet at Kempton and probably bet less. It's hard enough backing winners never mind not even getting a run.
Thhis kind of thing is bad PR for racing , about time BHA said if a horse refuses to race before the first hurdle/fence then it is a non-runner. But that's to straight forward for them.
Fast losing interest in the game what with this daylight robbery and the new whip rule ruining the game.
Thhis kind of thing is bad PR for racing , about time BHA said if a horse refuses to race before the first hurdle/fence then it is a non-runner. But that's to straight forward for them.
Fast losing interest in the game what with this daylight robbery and the new whip rule ruining the game.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 2
|
By:
100% correct this does nothing for racing the horse never went a yard like you say if they don't make the first hurdle /fence it should be a n/r
|
|
By:
Sporting Life Close-Up
"Endeavor (ex7) 11-1 Henry Brooke (5) Mrs Dianne Sayer 6 11/2 refused to race, took no part opened 6/1 QUOTE ! "Refused to race , took no part" How can any bookmaker with any credibility not deem this a non-runner and return stakes. What is the point of the big 5 having all these glamorous PR spokespeople when on the most important matter to their customers is ignored like this !! |