There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
all you clowns who dont you watch videos of previous races ? the horse needs a 1M 2f . the winner has only won over 7f what do you think hughes was going to do ? if this was going to be a fast run race the fav was a good thing . anyone who knows what they are doing would have surely worked out exactly what was going to happen . hughes stacking it up then he was going to quicken ! seb was going to be outpaced then try and catch him . you guys want to blame sanders for you not doing your homework .STOP TALKING THROUGH YOUR POCKETS !!!!!!!!
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 21
|
By:
Meh, it was a bad ride by Sanders whatever you say
|
|
By:
joined today to post that twice
shrood! |
|
By:
if "us clowns" could work out what was going to happen then surely Sanders could have done so as well
|
|
By:
You're the clown djudge. Sanders was on the horse that was most likely to stay but he rode it for speed and not stamina and allowed Hughes to get first run. It was a terrible ride.
|
|
By:
im too busy studying races so i dont sound like the stupid billy bunters on here ! but just trying to educate my lesser peers !!!
|
|
By:
All the more reason to castigate Sanders, by your own reasoning, djudge. If your main opposition is a beast that is not guaranteed to stay 10f, the last thing you should do is sit-and-sprint.
|
|
By:
djudge
another '2 minute' wonder |
|
By:
that is the way this horse has to be ridden !!! have any of you watched the horses previous runs ?
|
|
By:
He has to be ridden into a pocket ??
 |
|
By:
Oh dear
|
|
By:
oh djudge you really have embarrassed yourself with this opening post,as all the other posters have pointed out ,if repeater had run over further then more use should have been made of him not less.hughes"s horse did not quicken one bit whereas saunders horse did albeit under serrios restraint. it was a seriously poor ride but the ride isnt as bad as your post , maybe you may be better off sticking to skin vids rather than racing vids. lo,lolol
|
|
By:
oh djudge you really have embarrassed yourself with this opening post,as all the other posters have pointed out ,if repeater had run over further then more use should have been made of him not less.hughes"s horse did not quicken one bit whereas saunders horse did albeit under serrios restraint. it was a seriously poor ride but the ride isnt as bad as your post , maybe you may be better off sticking to skin vids rather than racing vids. lo,lolol
|
|
By:
Poor ride end of story- had to pull it out earlier and use its stamina. I take DJudge's point on the way the race was run, but still Sanders had to kick earlier rather than 100 yards out! He just left it too late and as a result was 2nd on a horse who was tanking after the winning line.
|
|
By:
sick of , you are obviously in the mix with the other idiots on here look at the sectionals of the race again then you will understand !!
|
|
By:
djudge everyones entitled to an opinion even a tw4t like you but do yourself a favour stop embarrassing yourself, 99.999%of the people who watched the race know it was a poor ride, i dont take ou to task that hughes is a better jockey , he would have won easily on the second.rule of thumb is the further your horse stays the more aggressively he needs to be ridden , sanders rode his horse like a non stayer rather than the true stayer.ive seen worse rides (invariably from claimers tho)
|
|
By:
Sick of your 100% rite dj wont be around very long i think!!!!!!!
|
|
By:
richie i thin dj has backed the winner for some derisory stake and is busy patting himself on the back for it , dont get me vwrong theres nowt wrong with backing a lucky winner we all back unlucky losers as well but only a fool ignores the fact that he was lucky due to his need to massage his ego. as you said this tw4t wont last long , (well as long as his loot lasts ) lolololol.
|
|
By:
The winner was given a ist class ride Repeater was not end off.
|
|
By:
Afternoon ROBINBANKS
|
|
By:
just what the forum needs - another newbie know-all FFS !!!!!!!!
 how the **** have we ever managed before ...................................? |
|
By:
ROBINBANKS!! no, please
 |