There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Investigate fully all non runners in dead eight races and fine harshly any withdrawals subsequently found to be unneccesary.
Stop Bookies taking the pi$$, no wonder punters are giving racing a wide berth when they are getting tucked up daily by this farcical situation
Stop Bookies taking the pi$$, no wonder punters are giving racing a wide berth when they are getting tucked up daily by this farcical situation
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 16
|
By:
and they moan about decimalisation being the reason why turnover is 35% down..7 runners with a odds on jolly in some lol
|
|
By:
what a pair of mugs.
|
|
By:
he comes a bookie ..please explain then instead of using abuse
|
|
By:
7 runners with an odds on jolly
why is that the fault of bookies ? |
|
By:
investigate fully ?
just find another interest if your so bitter and twisted you suspect everything that does not suit you to be** |
|
By:
do you think it affected turnover?
|
|
By:
i never said it was the fault of bookies..please read what i said ,he might actually help you to make stupid mistakes
|
|
By:
You only have to look at the breakdown of the amount of runners since GPT started, 16 plus handicaps have fallen dramatically and thirteen to fifteen runner races have shot up
quelle surprise |
|
By:
no i dont
|
|
By:
turnover can increase with a short one.
|
|
By:
Here is a e mail from Kemptons clerk, sent to a poster when asking about 16 runner handicaps and the 14 runner"Safety" limit
Subject: RE: 16 runner handicap Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 08:59:18 +0100 From: Beverley.Frith@jockeyclubracecourses.com To:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Our safety factor is 16 - we generally have a maximum field size of 14 to protect the LBO money and its also a compromise between jockeys and racecourse as the jockeys are happier with a safety factor of 14. Id imagine paying only 3 places instead of 4 would help to protect LBO money |
|
By:
foxy if you think odds on jollies in a 7 runner races of todays standard improve turnover we will have to agree to disagree..and because you dont agree with me i will refrain from calling you a mug..strange hey
|
|
By:
hallgate,racecourse is different to the sp shops regarding turnover.
sorry for calling you a mug that was uncalled for. |
|
By:
no probs ..:D
|
|
By:
as the only person with 5 years stats but why bother those who agree will be 10% those who hate you mentioning tricky EW races 50% and the rest couldn't care less because they bet Each-way in the races that only someone divide of knowledge would. 40%.
Let them all except that they are not being had over anf we will have to bet in less races. cubone. |
|
By:
as a casual racetrack punter..betting 20-50 a race or 2-300 in total dayout ,pretty sure that i would of kept most in my pockets today with the cards.
reagrds decialisation it is so much easier to read and workout which bookie is giving best prices compared to some of the recent fractions being banded about 16/5 21/10 and so on its just bookies trimming away the 7/2 11/10 shots with higher looking odds..no wonder bookies are against change.everyboard offering deciamls is more transparent to the causual,well all punters imvho |