Unnamed jockey

Not sure but hats off to BF for highlighting it. They (and the BHA) get a lot of criticism on here suggesting suspicous betting patterns aren't looked at so just goes to show there is a lot going on behind the scenes that we're not aware of imvho. These cases seem to takes a while to come to light so it seems that just because there is no immediate info about a suspicous drift doesn't mean nothing is happening.

Yes BF spotted that they constantly layed the same jockey.

It actually got me nervous.....I always lay Richard Hills when he is in a neck to neck finish :D

BHA spokesman said that this had all the hallmarks of bets being placed with inside information but there was insufficient evidence to proceed against the jockey. The jockey's driver was asked to produce phone records but claimed the mobile was lost for the 4 weeks under investigation even when evidence revealed 26 phone calls were made during this period.

1)well done betfair
2)these investigations are few and far between,not been one for ages - should be more imo - betfair need to up their game .