There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
No not me.
3.45 Catt, Mr Johnston knows where he's at with the other fancied runners, has won this race as often as Channon in the last few years but the difference is Channon doesn't seem to be firing at all and I can't have Fallon at the moment. Yes the angry one gives weight away here but the ratings imo could be all wrong after so few runs.
The step up in distance shouldn't be an issue and we know the ground is fine, which can't be said for the other principles.
Top track jockey and trainer should go very close here imo at the best price of the market leaders.
3.45 Catt, Mr Johnston knows where he's at with the other fancied runners, has won this race as often as Channon in the last few years but the difference is Channon doesn't seem to be firing at all and I can't have Fallon at the moment. Yes the angry one gives weight away here but the ratings imo could be all wrong after so few runs.
The step up in distance shouldn't be an issue and we know the ground is fine, which can't be said for the other principles.
Top track jockey and trainer should go very close here imo at the best price of the market leaders.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
Tajaarub looks the one for me in that one.
|
|
By:
Tajaarub no value whatsoever IMO. Even if it wins.
|
|
By:
Maybe you're right but all I will say is that Mark Johnston had the odds on favourite in 2nd place in Tajaarubs winning maiden a length away.
|
|
By:
Why not Le Sorcier?
|
|
By:
AgentR you may well be right but it doesn't quite work like that. Mark Johnston could have something planned in the future for this horse so it may not be a case of A beat B so C should beat A. I don't even think Mister Angry is even 2nd best in this race.
I won't be touching the race myself, so good luck with your selection. |
|
By:
It generally serves me well tbh as a route into finding the winner of a race with only a few runners.
|