There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
I have often wondered all the grade 1 courses(except Ascot which is ATR+Turf TV,confusion?) made their decisions to align themselves to RUK.Or,conversely,how the others opted for ATR.There are a few non grade1,like Warwick,Catterick,Bangor,that are with RUK,but I wonder what led to the choice.More importantly who finished with the better deal.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 11
|
By:
Who gets what seems like the best kept secret in racing!
|
|
By:
hojo gets it
|
|
By:
I think RUK is a co-op for its courses and ATR just pays the tracks. Presumably if RUK floats on the stock market at some point racing will do very well.
|
|
By:
Still strange how all the big courses York,Newmarket,Aintree,Sandown,Chester, Goodwood etc. opted for RUK without question.
|
|
By:
the 2-bob tracks need to chase the atr/sis dollar more
another poser is why they all keep signing long term deals |
|
By:
Its the Sun v The Daily Mail isn't it. How on earth SIS can find people 2 sit in the booth for 16 hours a day as Chappers used 2 do is beyond me! Oh and he was also Dazzlers agent. What kind of Coffee was he drinking? ;)
|
|
By:
You have got to look at who owns the racecourse, I think a lot of the atr courses have a lot of shared ownership with atr! So when atr boast about paying money to the racecourses they are being a little bit**
|
|
By:
yep and the bookies own some of SIS so when they complain about paying for picture rights in the shops....
|
|
By:
Arena,and they are not "two bob tracks",have 25% of the fixtures.There is nothing wrong with Windsor.
|
|
By:
nothing wrong with any atr track... but dubious owners in arena and northern
|
|
By:
**Mould,good guy.
|