Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
The Grimster
11 Apr 10 08:53
Joined:
Date Joined: 12 Aug 09
| Topic/replies: 3,713 | Blogger: The Grimster's blog
Can anybody, anywhere,help me??

Ive read these threads "national disgrace" from on course books, betfairs stance, punters threads everything?


After reading these can anybody tell me please how dont push it got returned at 10/1, when everywhere its been stated the lowest price it ever went on course was 14/1?

Thats a 4 point drop? something very naughty is going on here?

Like i said im a bit thick so what can be done to let the general public know that there friendly "happy to help" bookies have not been that helpful.

Thanks for reading.


Lambs to slaughter springs to mind.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 36
By:
MONEY TREE
When: 11 Apr 10 08:58
YOU JOKER.
By:
wee eck
When: 11 Apr 10 09:00
This racing game is a free for all if you can get away with it good luck, it is a real dog eating dog scenario everyone who can seeing what they can get away with. I wish I could think of a few angles to increase my chances.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:02
bookies wanted joint favs so you only get half stakes..simples.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:03
It is not you sir, anyone who watched the betting 25mins to the off yesterday would be gobsmacked at the amount of horses bet? it was a quiet unbelievable sight and many of us have never seen that sort of pattern in a major race before on such a big scale? i still do not understand what went on? i am thick too!
By:
wee eck
When: 11 Apr 10 09:04
Bookies have to live.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:05
Did that sell the grand national?
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:06
scousers been saving giro's up for 3 weeks?
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:06
FAIR ENOUGH .

BUT HOW WHEN STATED BY THE ON COURSE BOOKS THAT 14S WAS THE LOWEST IT WENT DID IT RETURN 10S??
Opps sorry for shouting. thats all i want to know, i dont understand?


Surely s/p means starting price does it not? or does it mean suckers/punish them.
By:
diddles
When: 11 Apr 10 09:07
Grimster - the price on course the winner was 9 10 or 12 for most of the last 15 minutes b4 the race. Prior to that the best seen was 16. You cant blame them as the course bookmakers had them 10 deep having £5 bets. Every year its the same - If I was standing at Aintree and I had once a year punters betting £5 -£10 bets e-way I would want to bet to 150.
The Grand national has always been the same and quotes about the big 3 losing 10 mill each is rubbish
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:07
it seems trainers targeted individual groups of bookmakers in a pre arranged way and got there runners to bet at the same time? wow
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:08
corr upt sp starters.
By:
wee eck
When: 11 Apr 10 09:08
Grimster, you enjoy when possible trimming the books up, yesterday the compliment was returned, move on.,
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:09
EHH?? 9 10S? AINT SAYING YOU AINT RGT DIDDLES BUT ADAGE IS A ON COURSE BOOK AND HE STATED 14S WAS THE LOWEST IT WENT?

Agghhhhh fecking caps locks again!!:)
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:09
it was like watching the stock market in the early days of recession?Volatile!
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:10
ap eventialy get sports personality of the year.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:12
It seems the oncourse had two books going on, and wanted to trade in running/ does that make more sense?
By:
sevey
When: 11 Apr 10 09:12
A Wall Street CRASH
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:14
if it happened any where else it would be called fraud
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:14
wee eck 11 Apr 09:08


Grimster, you enjoy when possible trimming the books up, yesterday the compliment was returned, move on.,

Hold on a min wee eck, yes il have one over them if i can,as they will me.We play in the big boys world, where it is dog eat dog.

Yesterday was diff, these spineless knock back merchants, preyed on the vunrable as usual, only thing im surprised at is it wasnt compulsory to have a spin on a fobt before your bet was placed
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:15
tambhoy5 11 Apr 09:13


if it happened any where else it would be called fraud

correct.
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:17
as a serious punter i only lost £12 ..but still£12 too much.
By:
diddles
When: 11 Apr 10 09:18
Ok well I only went down to have a gander and stretch my legs- not to bet. so i migfht be mistaken but i didnt see anything above 12-1 - you know what also happens Ladbrokes and co Do stump up and clean the front row 2 points on the top 6 every year - just before the off at Aintree not many betts are struck as 5 mins before the off all the loonys bolt for a perch - its easy for Ladbrokes to trim em.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:18
I think racing should have a good look at want went on there and find out the truth? what did the press boys make of it? and will that change forever the way in which punters and bookmakers operate on a big race?
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:20
wee eck??
By:
diddles
When: 11 Apr 10 09:22
But only the once a year punters bet SP on the national. so is it such a crime - lets face it they only block the way to the till for 2 weeks after- asking if the bookmaker paid out on the 6th home and quiz why they only got back 15.50 when they laid out a tenner and the horse was placed
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:27
off thread i know.. on choi in masters @190 £130 should i lay off at 18.5 or take my chance?
By:
forecast
When: 11 Apr 10 09:28
ap not the houswvies choice? r you jokin? i work in a bookies and for my cashiers and helpers on the day i wrote down which horse he was on as its the most commmonly asked question every year, every 'clueless' punter wants to back whoever they hear is the top jockey regardless, even if the hourse only has 3 legs. Good luck to everyone who had the winner even if 10/1 was a little skinny dont push it carried the largest volume of sinlge bets for us yesterday even if not he largest stakes
By:
diddles
When: 11 Apr 10 09:29
I fully agree its not queensbury rules - But Bookmakers as we all know are manipulators of the innocent. Whilst being scared stiff of the barrow boys.
By:
geoff m
When: 11 Apr 10 09:31
All get swept under carpet in the post as ye canna bite the arm that feeds ya.
Only hope is Lydia picks up on it as not many other journos prepared to risk free lunches & put their head above the parapet.
Shambolic.
Racing for change, trying to attract new customers to a sport thats rotten to the core.
Still love it tho & becomes even more fascinating with all the skullduggery.
By:
The Grimster
When: 11 Apr 10 09:34
geoff m.

too true.

correct diddles. rgt wheres the dirty ew today, catch you later.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:35
What kind of trade was taking place?
By:
tambhoy5
When: 11 Apr 10 09:36
psmsl.girlfriend had £1 on the top 10 in market and she is happy.
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:41
How can you trade out if everything shortens before you get chance to press your buttons??? ffs
By:
peckham flasher
When: 11 Apr 10 09:41
at least dick turpin wore a mask B-)
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:42
oncourse bookmakers at war with betfair layers???? DO YOU WANT SOME!!!!!!!
By:
metro john
When: 11 Apr 10 09:47
it seems some larger layers on here may have to send reps to the course!
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com