|
By:
the tree?
|
|
By:
haha probably!
|
|
By:
Yep - after backing horse, I moved to laying it ... not too much damage done though happily...
|
|
By:
apparently it normally sweats up before racing though????
|
|
By:
if its enjoyed it .....could inprove no end .........handycapper involved
|
|
By:
More useless info at the start from Rishi. WTF do they employ him for ? it can only be to be PC
|
|
By:
surprised hazel irwin didnt ride the winner.....she;s on golf;snooker;athlectics.....if you can understand it talking.
|
|
By:
the sweating up had nothing to do with it,the horse was always trading on here between 17.5 & 19.5,the sp price was a mugging for the public.
|
|
By:
well said book
|
|
By:
false gambles galore, nearly every horse had shortened ten mins before the off
|
|
By:
winner was laid heavily also means winner was backed heavily .
so we have a conspiricy brewing ,it was a sweater being backed . the sp was manipulated by ladbroken on course by backing it with the sp sample bookies ? what was the toat sp and bf sp . and who was biggest in the high street in the morning ? |
|
By:
None of these punters (who layed DPI at the sight of weat) saw Sandy Lyle's armpits at the Masters in 1988!
|
|
By:
tote paid about 13-1,bf was 18-1,22-1 freely available in the morning
|
|
By:
what price was crooks ?...ta
|
|
By:
16 i think
|
|
By:
they were 20-1 as were everyone else bar four of them who went 22-1
|