form book...

loose, lose is a freudian slip

two 40/1 shots in a row , what you gonna do ?

MST, how's it going mate?

As you bet ir does it matter the price of the winner?

warhol, absolutely pants this year , but having a blinding april so far so can't complain, just backed that thing for a place so in very good mood, pity i didn't do the win , for some reason thought it couldn' beat notus dlt or santuaire, thought they might be 1-2-3 again

err, at Aintree, just forget Cheltenham winners, Big Bucks excepted, as he as already done it before. It takes alot out of a horse to win at Cheltenham, now Imperial Commander, well Cheltenham is its favourite course, however it all but beat Kauto at Haydock, so has a chance, but it has achieved its objective for the season. There may be 1 other Cheltenham/Aintree double winner this year, but they all go off short prices. so are not worth backing.

Keep up the good work, hope it's the beginning of a good long run for you.

There was no form to go off in the Leicester 2-yr-old race -

Uncles you LAID the front 2 in the betting because their previous 2nd and 3rd at Folkestone was in a slowl time run on a bog.

As for Aintree - well it is a law until itself - every year.

But wise ones know that this flat fast track is completely different to the 'ups and downs', and final hill of Cheltenham.

warhol how you finding it, i see they closed the warrington shop so thats not a back up option anymore

MST, been away for a bit putting a business plan together. I think Aintree is an opportunity to do an Alan Potts and go against the crowd as form is tailing off.

Sad about Warrington -- have exchanged emails with Victor, and am sure he'll be back, he put a lot into that.

Good luck mate.

onlooker 08 Apr 14:48
There was no form to go off in the Leicester 2-yr-old race -

Uncles you LAID the front 2 in the betting because their previous 2nd and 3rd at Folkestone was in a slowl time run on a bog.


????

I reply to cricnut - have a look at The Red Rum Hcap Chase and The Grand Annual m8.

Merely an 'all round' remark, muqbil mate - meaning the 'form' was entirely inconclusive and almost irrelevant, due to the ground for a race made up of unraced 2-yr-olds.

Posted in response to an 'in-running' ONLY punter who started a thread about the FORM Book - which he will rarely, if ever, open ...

and then drifts the thread into a 'chit chat' with a similar mate. :)

onlooker 08 Apr 15:23


Merely an 'all round' remark, muqbil mate - meaning the 'form' was entirely inconclusive and almost irrelevant, due to the ground for a race made up of unraced 2-yr-olds.

Posted in response to an 'in-running' ONLY punter who started a thread about the FORM Book - which he will rarely, if ever, open ...

and then drifts the thread into a 'chit chat' with a similar mate

bit unfair mate i do my own ratings and study the game more than most, i play pre race admittedly to fun stakes and not too seriously

Just going off your many threads about the PC due to your 'in-running' modus operandi, MANCHESTER, mate.

We have discussed your 'Speed Ratings' approach before, a long time ago, on General Betting.

As many on here know full well - I do not equate 'Speed Ratings' with traditional FORM study.

fair enough , whatever way you look at it some of these results in big races have been virtually impossible to predict using any method, they seem almost random at times, good luck

another fine result, raceform surely couldn't give away form books now lol

another one to reward form book students , its another bloodbath