Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Onionss
08 Apr 10 14:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 09 Aug 09
| Topic/replies: 13,050 | Blogger: Onionss's blog
fecking joke

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 7
By:
theorakle
When: 08 Apr 10 14:27
disgrace
By:
RowbeesFouler
When: 08 Apr 10 14:28
Unbelievable - jockeys can look at this race and carve up anyone without a danger of being thrown out
By:
troy71
When: 08 Apr 10 14:28
CORRECT DECISION!!!
By:
ImSoLuckyLucky!
When: 08 Apr 10 14:31
Is that Andy?

:)
By:
efisio.
When: 08 Apr 10 14:31
It's the rules that need changing.
By:
king_james18
When: 08 Apr 10 14:32
was it changed around?
By:
Artifice
When: 08 Apr 10 14:35
Agree with efisio. The rules badly need changing - if we had proper rules that horse would have been trading at 1.01 to get the race. There is very little doubt but that the 2nd horse was the best horse and imo the horse who is interfered with should always get the benefit of the doubt.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com