There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
04 Apr 10
15:45
Joined:
Date Joined:
06 Feb 10
Re zaarito
lol
lol
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 38
|
By:
I DIDNT BACK EITHER AN FIRST GLANCE I AGREE BUT NEED SEE REPLAY IF I HAVE TOO APOLIGISE
|
|
By:
Would av absolutely hosed up :0
|
|
By:
:| was cruising though?
|
|
By:
the winner was closing him down ...but only because condon was sat there with an absolute ton of horse underneath him imo
|
|
By:
Have to jump the fences to win probably would have fell at the next :p
|
|
By:
^ True :(
|
|
By:
WANT SEE AGAIN BUT BJG IS GOOD JUDGE OR POCKED TALKER ?
|
|
By:
Lots left in the tank, but ya have to jump em. Would have won if he stood up.
|
|
By:
too far out to be certain of anything in all fairness
|
|
By:
POCKED TALKER (imo)
:^0 |
|
By:
Was being hauled back - wouldnt have placed
|
|
By:
I can confirm, that on this occasion...
Mr Walsh is talking through his arse.. |
|
By:
They are there to be jumped but if he stood up no way the winner woulda beat him imvho ;)
Pity he cant jump, some engine, a big race to be won somewhere wit him if they can sort the jumpoin out! |
|
By:
would have hacked up imo
Ted taking through his hole |
|
By:
win lose or draw ted's always talkin thru his backside...now having a go at the horse welfare crowd sayin they know nothing.what a fkn muppet he is.
|
|
By:
Miss Victoria Blaze 04 Apr 15:55
would have hacked up imo Ted taking through his hole Strong opinion for someone who has been here less then 2 months. |
|
By:
Looked the winner to me.
|
|
By:
Zaarito's jockey, Davy Condon, felt that his mount would have been a big player but for falling, saying: "It mighthave looked different in the stands but I didn't feel he was emptying, and he would have gone close."
|
|
By:
having watched race 3 times now - i think he would have won...i did back it, but accept the risk with this bad lad...but I do believe he would have won and won quite nicely.....how can they stop him doing the mistakes is the important thing
|
|
By:
tired fall imo seemed to be weakening fast when fell
|
|
By:
He is getting so much exposure through his son, he actually thinks he knows what he is talking about.
|
|
By:
grand national winning trainer. yeah really clueless
|
|
By:
Tell me something i dont know, honestly some muppets on here
|
|
By:
grand national winning trainer. yeah really clueless
Yes with the Grand National being the test of such great trainers. On that Logic Paul Nicholls, AP McCoy etc are rubbish? |
|
By:
i didnt say he was a great trainer but i would say he knows alot more than you
|
|
By:
ted implying if he trained it would have won half the track.
would have hosed in still cantering. |
|
By:
He was on the radio Thursday and didnt give Zaarito a chance said Kempes is the best horse in the field.
He was just backing up his claim about Zaarito saying it wudnt have won. Childish |
|
By:
it was weakening
|
|
By:
the bottom line is he is a better mouthpiece than he will ever be a trainer
|
|
By:
weakening ?had not come off the bridle ,
|
|
By:
just watched it and IMO theres no way one could say he was DEFINITELY goin to win!looked to be goin v easy but so was winner!!wasnt a cert imo!
|
|
By:
i didnt say he was a great trainer but i would say he knows alot more than you
How do you know I'm not Ted Walsh? Bet you'd feel foolish then eh? |
|
By:
hiya ted
|
|
By:
Pretty gutted and had Fort George in 435 who fell two out when looking to be going the best. just the way it goes!
|
|
By:
too far out to say anything for certain , you'll seen umpteen horses in a lifetime going that well at that stage and be beaten.
We'll never know. |
|
By:
maybe you are ginger mccain, he's trained at least 3 grand national winners & he never talks *%$%
|
|
By:
Agree with Ted, wouldn't have won, watch the replay and know the horses.
|
|
By:
Matched at 1.14 for a canny bet
|