Horse Antepost
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
29 May 22
17:39
Joined:
Date Joined:
12 Jul 07
Wonder if the time and/or ratings guru's because are some intelligent geezers on here still could be so kind as to give their thoughts please explain whether Oz are quicker if they are how much what that equates to and compare to what else might be in the field believe will be Kings Stand and Platinum Jubilee thanks.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 9
|
By:
LOTO, not my area but I think Sandown may have dabbled in Australian time ratings so he may be able to shed some light on their chances. It's worth noting that Australia changed their rules on what was allowed to be used on horses out of training in 2014 and haven't come close to winning either race since. I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions, mine were just reaffirmed. Wesley Roid is another matter
 |
|
By:
Many thanks Figgis been long time hope you are keeping very well am thinking about lumping on might be huge difference men against boys so to speak we'll see.
|
|
By:
Has WINX arrived yet ?
|
|
By:
Men v boys indeedy never ever in doubt oi oi for the Liberator pom pom tonight.
|
|
By:
Anyone else think the loading time for this race was scandalous?
Probably the reason the American horse missed the kick. |
|
By:
Well done LOTO.
|
|
By:
Thanks Figgis looks like time was very good not that i know much about that think southern hemisphere sprinters are just that little bit better as the jock pointed out on numerous occasions before the race.
|
|
By:
LOTO, yes it was a top class time performance. It was nothing that hasn't been done before by the likes Blue Point and Battaash at their best, but our 5f horses are really poor this year.
|
|
By:
All aboard the next one boom boom shakalaka.
|