|
By:
Hello Pz. Sorry - only just seeing this.
The answer is 'no' afaik. I suggested this to them a few years ago and they wouldn't talk. It makes no sense at all, does it? I don't see why a 10% holdover wouldn't be enough. |
|
By:
cheers.
so if you lay TR to lose £500 you have to put up another £500 to lay another horse,tying up a Grand. |
|
By:
Nah, it's not quite that bad. You could lay all the horses to lose £500 and you'd have a £500
liability. I'll simplify to a 2 horse race for ease of explaining. Normally both horses are 1.9 (say) and you take £100 on each to get a green book for £10 - liability against your account balance is zero. Same scenario in a 2 horse grand national (I know, but bear with me) is that you have a £90 liability so that your account balance is £90 lower than it was before. A more probable scenario: you've laid £5000 and have a green book for, say, £250. However, offsetting is not allowed so your account balance has gone down by about £4750 (give or take). Hope that makes sense. |
|
By:
PS You'll have noticed that the right hand side is >100% at the moment, which reflects the
chance of ballots. It was >107% a few days ago, but there was no one mopping it up because 1. It gets expensive quickly and 2. It's very risky because who knows which ones will be balloted? |
|
By:
tx
GL |
|
By:
You too
|