Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
metro john
15 May 16 16:57
Joined:
Date Joined: 02 Jan 07
| Topic/replies: 26,193 | Blogger: metro john's blog
https://youtu.be/fyUVpEt6TxU

Video quality not great, but that is all we got right now.

A brilliant performance from The Gurkha clear winner by 5.5 lenghts with the rest pretty much bunched together. Rating this race will not be easy, with the second and third falling below standards for the race itself.

On my ratings I would go 124 for the winner, which would put  the 2nd First Selection 109 some 15 lb behind the winner and just a standard Group3 winner give or take a few lb. It should be interesting how handiccapers react to this victory, but impressive it was.Cool

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 8
By:
metro john
When: 15 May 16 19:03
Just watching the video again, there must some doubt about him staying or being better at 12 furlongs, he took them apart a good furlong out, surely too much speed, and his dam Chintz was a 7f group winner?, ok further down the dam line 12f winners are to be seen, and the mix with Galileo could produce anything, but verdict for me is 10f will be optimum, and best surely the mile or even 7f. AOB always seems to revert us to the boys with  his after race comments(not always accurate?), I hope we have a superstar with scope to stay. This was just his 3rd run, and a 124 rating is amazing, I suppose I am confused by his first race defeat, but this is nothing new, but does detract opinion a little.
By:
cardifffc
When: 15 May 16 19:34
time was slower than the 1000g probably means it wasn't a vintage 2000
By:
brain dead jockeys
When: 15 May 16 19:50
cardiff..........they went no pace whatsoever in 1st 4 furlongs.........it was a dawdle
By:
metro john
When: 16 May 16 23:02
Interesting you should say this brain dead jockeys, I always assume a slower pace gives the speedsters that can settle a much bigger chance, with that in mind then it is even more remarkable he took them apart a furlong out, perhaps not such a slow early pace? will have to check out the time gurus opinions.
By:
metro john
When: 16 May 16 23:06
The improvement from first to third run is of more interest to me.
By:
ReaseHeath
When: 16 May 16 23:12
There's a theory doing the rounds that some of the also rans were in the stalls an awful long time waiting for The Ghurka to be re-shod. First three finishers all amongst last four to be loaded though I accept it was really a case of TG first, the rest nowhere - hard to knock TG but suspect some of the others might have underperformed.
By:
metro john
When: 16 May 16 23:18
First Selection suggests the form looks inferior to the Guineas, the opposite to my own ratings, this should not be overlooked.
By:
metro john
When: 16 May 16 23:42
Let us not forget AFB!(over the mile perhaps)
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com