Greyhounds
|
By:
First 2 in betting ran well..
|
|
By:
They wonder why turnover on the sport is falling through the floor…
|
|
By:
4 grade uplift for the 5 in this one at Mullingar. Don;t think I;ve ever seen that before. Trainer well and trully put in the dock!
|
|
By:
Did I fancy the trap 2 no, as it’s never usually fast away
You need to watch the races, in the first round and semi it did not lead early on and had to use its pace just to get the lead In the final it pinged and managed to go 4 length clear It basically managed to be three lengths better off with the dogs early on and then kept its lead It just got caught in the early rounds as well You need to stop gambling if you have a problem with that final |
|
By:
hes on everday this and that stopped/not trying juiced up.brain damage not got a scooby.
|
|
By:
was there for the semi finals, it led off the crown of the first bend you sileek hunt
|
|
By:
garryc, put 10k up we will have a little challenge if you like..?
|
|
By:
i'll even give you 2/1 your money..
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
have probably 6 bets a day. I noticed you refused the offer, trouble with this place this days, too many two bob billy bunters.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
1st round 16.71 minus 25 = 16.46
Semi 16.76 minus 35 = 16.41 Final 16.42 minus 25 = 16.17 Therefore it went approximately 3 lengths quicker to the winning line first time round in the final If it had done this in the first round and the semi, then the dog would have been unbeaten throughout the comp It’s pretty easy to understand |
|
By:
garryc, i see you are a relative newbie to the exchange so will forgive your naivety. You must be the only person involved in the game that thinks every hound in every race is there on its merit
. Plenty of industry figures some of whom are very well respected know the score. Saddly you seem oblivious. GL all the same. |
|
By:
Ravage please get your facts right before posting rubbish.
First round 16.71 minus 35 = 16.36 Semi 16.76 minus 50 = 16.26 Final 16.42 minus 35 =16.07. |
|
By:
Just a final question for you garryc.. whos money do you think is in the lay boxes on the dogs..?
|
|
By:
You taken off 50 per cent of the going allowance for approx 37 per cent of the time sectional / winning time
You can’t do that it’s inaccurate My figures were 36 per cent for minus 70 And 35 per cent for minus 100 going Therefore my numbers are much more accurate than yours afraid |
|
By:
Garry and Ravage i feel your pain. I have been foolish enough to engage with him on a couple of occasions. I even went back on a couple of dogs he said were the most crooked dogs he has seen since he has been in the game. After watching i was amazed as they were both pretty much their normal runs. Thought for a while that he or she was a wind up merchant but unfortunately for him i fear not. Talk about empty vessels and all that lol
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
I'm with you switch - if you don't think this game is corrupt, then god knows what planet you're living on. Still, it's all part of the intrigue. When I'm betting dogs, I'm always looking for "who is likely to be trying today?". If you don't see the need for that, then probably better not to play - as I tell myself again and again. ;)
|
|
By:
Switch what is the relevance of my post re "crookedness of the highest order" to what you constantly spout about ? My post had absolutely nothing to do with actual performance of any greyhounds.
|
