Greyhounds
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
06 Aug 22
19:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
10 Sep 09
The whole studio couldnt believe the Crayford 7:17 result called, the sis caller the same. Has anyone been able to stop the replay anywhere at all within 5m of the line on track either side and conclude 4 has won?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 39
|
By:
I cannot still believe the result and I was wondering if the photo print of the finish is published anywhere??
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
matching up the photo with the video still on the line, 3s outstretched right leg & 4 all paws off the ground...3 has clearly won photo 2nd 4/6
|
|
By:
the proportion of 4 relative to 3&6 on the photo just isn't right even allowing for 4 being a heavier dog...something mega fishy imo
|
|
By:
This was the best I could manage.
   |
|
By:
Obviously a mistake has been made but the problem is that there are a number of people in this world who are incapable of admitting to one.
|
|
By:
Truly incredible scenes from yet an other ladcrooks track.
|
|
By:
they did put the photo up on RPGTV
i betted less hope on friday and would not have taken 25/1 in the photo.......it won.. believe detective blue won a three way photo and no one at RPGTV could believe it. again they shown the photo crayford send them |
|
By:
starship, how did the photo on RPGTV compare with the pictures I have put up?
|
|
By:
i dunno as i was only listening as i was on the phone in the other room
|
|
By:
the photo print they put up literally ran at a right angle, it just cannot be right? every other track have a straight line on their prints....
|
|
By:
the pictures you have put up sparrow show at no point anywhere near the line is 4 in front. To me the print they showed resembled the dogs a good few metres before the line
|
|
By:
Here's the thing. They reckon the result is 4-3-6 with short head distance between first, second and third. If for some reason there is an absurd angle showing the 4 (inside 3), to have won by a short head, surely the distance between 3 (inside 6) has to be bigger?? Looking at that photo, must be half a length if 4 has won!
|
|
By:
It surely has to be a mistake.
|
|
By:
For some reason unknown, someone at Crayford is bang at it calling these results wrong.. the question is why? are they being lent on etc?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
seems like if the wrong dog for them wins they think they can buy themselves a few pixels on a photo abominable practice
|
|
By:
One of my photos clearly shows the 4 just hitting the line with the 3 already past. The other photo shows 3 in front again just before the line so there is no way that 4 is in front either just before or just after the line.
|
|
By:
So the Red Circle is after the Line , As I was told the other week , So at what Point is 4 Possibly ahead of 3 , Crayford need to Explain how they Obtained the Print with 4 being ahead ,Well done on the Pics Sparrow , As I have stated before if This was horse racing there would be foooking Uproar ,No wonder Dave C wont call a photo anymore a Dog won half a length later in the Card he said I'm not calling it
 Its quite unbelievable that with today's Tech this can even be happening ,It what other sport would this be allowed to happen ,Its fooking scandalous, IF 4 has won the Race (on all known Evidence it has not bar the Miracle print) what is the fooking point of even showing the races ,Clearly what we are watching at the finnish is Irrelevant . |
|
By:
.
https://twitter.com/CrayRaceOffice/status/1543206717168783362/photo/1 |
|
By:
photo of the 234 from a month ago...
 |
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Just laughable. Why isn't the 3 far clearer of the 6 if 4 has won?? Just doesn't add up whichever way they wanna put a look on it.
|
|
By:
Is the 4 Dog half Dog Half Bear ? I never noticed this During the Race .But in the Official Photo ,we appear to have the head and the Neck of a bear Involved ..
6 Has also become an Italian Greyhound , Fantastic stuff from the Crayford Camera IMO ,Foooking nasa could not work these photos out .. |
|
By:
Have a look at the LINES ON THE TRACK
 in the photo ,How can they be at at Angle to the Winning Line ? Certainly look straight in the Images Sparrow has put up ?This caper is week in Week out in the Sport .. How much longer can it go on , Watched the ATHLETICS Earlier 1000th of a second , the Cricket they had Hawk eye Dog Racing we have JAPS EYE ... |
|
By:
I was once told some years ago by Jim Cremin of the Racing Post that the camera at Henlow was not on the line but as for Crayford you can take a guess as to where on earth the camera might be.
|
|
By:
the camera is on the line imo its blatantly a doctored photo
|
|
By:
Why is 4 3 times the Size of the 6 dog ,whats that all about , that this photo can even be produced as proof of a result Tells us the state the game is in ..
|
|
By:
as HGS has said, if its a deceptive angle (which it isn't) & 4 has "won" then on the same angle 6 is beat 1/2l
absolutely bang to rights |
|
By:
its doctored case
|
|
By:
T4 34.0kg, T6 30.8kg, T3 25.0kg
look at miniscule difference between 3&6 weight diff cannot explain this |
|
By:
The question is why? who is leaning on those in the racing office to call such results..?
|
|
By:
the £64,000 question
|
|
By:
Is that the 3 dogs Shadow or has an Alien Being entered the fray ?
|
|
By:
What ever is going on that Photo is unacceptable as proof of a Result , Incredible the Crayford racing office seen fit to post it
|
|
By:
Actually saw that race and there is no way the 4 dog won,none whatsoever,however by putting up the photo Crayford have made idiots of themselves as they cant now apologise for making a mistake. What should of been a simple pr exercise and an honest mistake excepted they have now gone down the Watergate route of pretending nothing untoward happened
|
|
By:
the official photo must have been tampered with by crayford managers office , so basically this is fraud call the police in ffs
|
|
By:
Foook knows whats Going on Micheal , I have photo Finnish prints from whitecity in the 70s ,Clear and concise ,Foooking ell its 50 year later and that Shyte is the best they can come up with , The sport is a Joke ..
Anybody on here who was the Track ? |
|
By:
michael 59.....
i dont know if pc plod would call it any different but for what its worth i thought 3 won a neck in live time and nothing from the video or stills has changed my mind......what i would say is it would be incredibly stupid to interfere with a photo on such a public race.....called the winner from the photo in the fist this evening and they looked very similar...... |