central park racing manager (should be sacked imo )

Does the racing manager make up the cards ?

Who else makes the card I know prize money is shocking at central but how many times has this track lost its bags contract due to cheating bookmakers turn a blind eye to it but it's the people on the exchange that are being screwed imo bags racing should be closed down for something that used to be a competitive product it's a license to cheat for the people in the know how many Chris mosdalls are there still training? quite a few imo.

To be fair.. the gamble in the 1:33 wasn’t really much of one. I tissued it at evs as it had the best early in a race full of ep types and only had a handful of starts. It’s no different to any other track at mo, they are being asked to race too much too often which results in the judges/video watchers etc having it off if putting in the work. Nothing wrong with that imo.

Although maybe your post has worked... meeting abandoned today

Bit like the 1.33 today trained by B O'Sullivan....flat as a pancake last time out, today chunks for it...only won by 5 plus lengths...open ya eyes racing manager!

the first race there last Sunday t5 gambled on all day wins by 6 lengths and improves by over a second in time, time finding pisses most punter off unless your in the know, but to be fair I don't think its happening just at central it at most tracks now you just have to watch the betfair markets for late clues poor prize gambling is the only way they can make it pay

^ poor prize money^

Well that's strange cause your example was B O'Sullivan as well....there is a pattern emerging...got that C.P R.Manager?

Stop winging ffs.. you don’t have to play every race every day... if you are too amateurish to spot things yourselves.. give the game up. Every trainer is entitled to have a few touches... I wouldn’t buy any more dogs if that wasn’t the case. CP is not the worst out there, but you can spot the proper money a good way out. Hazelwood arrow pinged out, made the bend and ran away from a very bad bunch of dogs.. only it’s 4th run over the distance. Not surprising a pup can find a few lengths.. trouble these days is.. too many trainers are no good at grading them in..

now wheres that switch!!! ive owned 2 dogs before if a dog finds over a second improvement the trainer being pulled into the racing office what amateurish about reading form on paper that was not the best dog in the race

Firstly.. the dog in question didn’t find over a second, secondly the going these days is being made to limit enquiries into time finding, thirdly, it’s part of the cat and mouse between punters/trainers and the books. Plenty of horses improve massively from 1st-2nd, 2nd-3rd runs etc. I would be far more concerned from those making a living from dogs taking no part at all than those having the occasional touch. Like I said, you don’t have to play every race every day. If a track, its set up or set of trainers worry you, move along. No such drama at Millersfield

They should be pulled up though on their inability to put up a photo print. The 9:12 being a classic example, the studio thought 1 won, the freeze suggests 1 has won. 2 called the winner without any print sent through....

think the angle @ sittingbourne is funky because there was race on bags around a month ago 6&1 photo looked like 6 had won a head ended up 1 being called
they did show the print tbf

Should just be an unsaid rule that the print is published where the distance is a neck or less.

Solves all problems, they must have the print to see what won.