Questoe Per Te 10/1 - is that a sackable offence??

some major price discrepancies, hope its easy pickings for you

if you pay peanuts you get monkeys

geyser was right ! finished last

It coming last ain't the point
if you keep punting dogs that kind of price
That go off what evens !! you beat them get
Results sometimes the books get away with it '
there get bashed if there wrong like that to often!

fattie the geyser weren't wrong on this occasion, it had the run of the race on the bunny and for me it was completely outclassed, no excuses, it was eights in the program and we thought it was a misprint

I have no idea as to the quality of the other 5 dogs in that race but winning notts A1s should be a world away from a race on derby final night

as for that litter not one of them has been tried beyond 680, some of them wouldn't get 850 yards in a fookin ambulance, and there is absolutely nothing in the freaky patch line so I aint surprised she hasn't stayed, 10/1 was probably crazy but they were betting evens jesus christ still plenty of fish about

when have you ever listened to me PF? normally you are after a fcking ruck

As others have said I would not have a clue regarding five Irish dogs

But one thing I do know is the graded strength at notts is fooking sh1te, the A1 dogs are useless

Not sure what price it was on  the machine, but if it was say 6-4 you should greened up for the same profit whatever won the race

The way it ran, maybe the odds compilers initial thought was right

i didn't start this thread until she was 2/1 DML - sure when the biggest SPK book had her a 9/4 shot i knew the price was always gonna be smashed

ah well sure, couldn't really give a toss now anyway win some, lose a lot more

Lots of not giving tosses here!

The disgrace is maybe the pittance said firm will only lay me on 2 dogs for the Laurels so don't start having a go at me about a disgrace!! Judging by what they will fkin lay me they seem to fkin think i know it all [which i don't].

You want to talk judges, Ted made the bitch 9/4 fav as he told me Friday night as i arrived in HRX and we where going through the prices at the bar, another real good judge with one of the books was on her too. She had done 18.95 the previous week in a trial behind Bittles Bar which you'd persume would mean she would go a long way clear but even after blowing the lids she could not hold Hi Dibbles to the 3rd bend which is just after the 350y line. She ran utterly pathetic, was beaten before stamina came into play.

And as for the thread is was a piss take.

And NO i am not a compiler, i have never worked for a bookmakers in my life.

We all know p_r_e_m_i_e_r__f_a_n_t_a_s_y is the Hills compiler DefiniteOpinion so there is no surprise here

Dunno BJG. But think PF says a lot of tongue-in-cheek stuff. Dont think he was trying to get anybody sacked, but a talking point, as i said to a few before all this became a hoo-haw. He's right in as much why state a price only to lay it to a few quid for the big gamblers, who are only trying to make a living or make ends meet. Personally, i was happy with 7/2 beforehand but in retropect, if you ran the race again, must surely be a 33/1 chance?

You can have 50/1 then!

lots of tossess being given now

yes it was cack, heard last night Volcano wasn't allowed run in it [how true i dunno}

suppose they didn't want a 1/10 shot on the card she will go for the 850y on Nov 30th