Greyhounds
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
19 Mar 13
21:16
Joined:
Date Joined:
13 Jul 11
SIGN HERE
FATTY..
...
FATTY..
...
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
|
By:
What a let down... 212 is better than this!!! Poor Show
 |
|
By:
Camera angles are a total joke...FU..ing idiots
|
|
By:
said the winner smashed the clock.
according to the dogs site was 29.38. pretty poor show all round |
|
By:
THAT DOG FASTER THAN JACK DIDNT LOOK IT ON -40 GOING TO0
|
|
By:
just said 29.30 now.
will it b 3rd x lucky |
|
By:
Shambles, camera angles we just don't want and amateurs like Tony Ellis telling us theres a bias when there aint......back to basics like RPTV......we don't need you going bias gravy train clueless twats!
|
|
By:
i agree about the camera angles but need to give the new format a chance, and its better than no greyhound racing at all on sky
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
very poor , clearly cost cutting , rpgtv closing the gap
|
|
By:
Don't know why you need to spend the money. I'd like to know what it costs to run RPGTV for one night, that givse you two FULL meetings, decent analysis (okay sometimes a bit dull but every heat gets a proper look-in), contributions from viewers which mix between decent and poor but do get everyone involved.
I see no way that Sky, despite the cost, matches it in any way shape or form. Come away from it, spend the money advertising 212 and get on with it. |
|
By:
.... biggest mistake by a t v company since thomas the tank engine went digital
 |
|
By:
irish base on last nights effort rpgtv miles infront
|