Have you learnt nothing Deptford? He wouldn't have been there for any combination of the following reasons:
1. He is only present when his team wins. 2. He was too busy at home counting his winnings from a major plunge that he had to enlist the help of One Eyed Joe to get all his money on for. 3. Was at Linda Jones' for tea. 4. Forgotten who he supports or who he is due to Walter Mitty tendencies.
Hope this helps.
Have you learnt nothing Deptford? He wouldn't have been there for any combination of the following reasons:1. He is only present when his team wins.2. He was too busy at home counting his winnings from a major plunge that he had to enlist the help
Dog Racing: I LOVE THIS GAME; Upsetting owners just part of the job, promise!
Mary Harding trained one of the best staying bitches I've ever seen, First Defence, at that time. Also housed in her Burhill kennels was a slowcoach by the name of Graigue Punch. First Defence would have lapped him.
After labelling the dog 'a camel', the owners sent me some light-hearted, computer-generated caricatures in defence of their beast. The pictures of me weren't flattering, but it was all done in great fun and I've still got their correspondence in my garage. Excellent banter.
'Lacks a yard of top-class pace to the bend'. That's all I wrote. To this day, I still can't work out why the owner came up to me, and said, while removing his glasses: "Come on, outside. We'll settle this once and for all. My dog can't read, but I can." I stayed inside.
Lying count.... he wrote worse than that and I wasn't wearing glasses
Dog Racing: I LOVE THIS GAME; Upsetting owners just part of the job, promise!Mary Harding trained one of the best staying bitches I've ever seen, First Defence, at that time. Also housed in her Burhill kennels was a slowcoach by the name of Graigue P
I dont normally read his guff, but had time on my hands today. But I say, I say, I say, has anyone read the complete and utter tripe in the Pricewise column today page 96 of Racing Post (tonight first half of Round 2 Derby, Friday) tipping 2 dogs that will be over 50/1 on BF tonight
I do wonder if he just writes this stuff for a bet and we're the fools for thinking he means it?
I dont normally read his guff, but had time on my hands today. But I say, I say, I say, has anyone read the complete and utter tripe in the Pricewise column today page 96 of Racing Post (tonight first half of Round 2 Derby, Friday) tipping 2 dogs tha
wife out to get me a paper will let you know when i get back but the racing post website shows he has napped lemon pluto and put a NB to loughteen blanco
wonder if he actually watches it any more. isnt he supposed to have given up punting dogs after the thing in springbok got led up? i wish he had. he got shuffled across to report on horses, makes out he is a judge and has a clue what he is talking about there, then shuffles over because he is the "wimbledon expert" the man does anything to justify a job there id be embarassed to be honest i probably mops the floors and makes the tea and replaces the bog roll as well
wife out to get me a paper will let you know when i get back but the racing post website shows he has napped lemon pluto and put a NB to loughteen blanco wonder if he actually watches it any more. isnt he supposed to have given up punting dogs after
"however the most likely candidate to pull off a derby win from behind is undoubltedly TSR"
fecking clueless cant .... in the same article he says "recent history might suggest this sort of exaggerated running style simply cannot win a derby"
"however the most likely candidate to pull off a derby win from behind is undoubltedly TSR"fecking clueless cant .... in the same article he says "recent history might suggest this sort of exaggerated running style simply cannot win a derby"
in the RP today under the "5 things we now know section" #3 "Garryglass Rodge is not a one dimensional sprinter" but ended the paragraph saying Rodge could develop in the mould of sprinters Tims Crow and Ningbo Jack.
Is that world class contradiction journalism, or am I missing the some subtle nuance?
in the RP today under the "5 things we now know section" #3 "Garryglass Rodge is not a one dimensional sprinter" but ended the paragraph saying Rodge could develop in the mould of sprinters Tims Crow and Ningbo Jack. Is that world class contradictio
KNOCKGLASS BILLY RUN OFF FOR THE SECOND SUCCESSIVE WEEK AT THE FIRST BEND!!
**** ME I THOUGHT THE POOR **** HAD NOWHERE TO GO !+ I THOUGHT MONEY TALKS RAMMED THE ****
KNOCKGLASS BILLY RUN OFF FOR THE SECOND SUCCESSIVE WEEK AT THE FIRST BEND!!**** ME I THOUGHT THE POOR **** HAD NOWHERE TO GO !+ I THOUGHT MONEY TALKS RAMMED THE ****
The man talks absolute bowlocks He also says “getting berthed inside him (Rodge) is fraught with potential danger”, 1st round, eske was in 2 won the race, tango was in 1 got a clear run, last weekend round 2, guess what … all the dogs inside him got a clear run. Rodge is so quick he’s gone … but the total MORON hasn’t sussed it yet
The man talks absolute bowlocksHe also says “getting berthed inside him (Rodge) is fraught with potential danger”, 1st round, eske was in 2 won the race, tango was in 1 got a clear run, last weekend round 2, guess what … all the dogs inside h
to be fair, we were all saying exactly the same thing pre first round.
Its not an easy job, no apology for getting things in contradiction but it isnt easy.
*Hic*
to be fair, we were all saying exactly the same thing pre first round.Its not an easy job, no apology for getting things in contradiction but it isnt easy.*Hic*