Forums

Greyhounds

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
bannahan
09 Mar 13 08:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 15 Mar 12
| Topic/replies: 24,129 | Blogger: bannahan's blog
21:15 Wimbledon
Green Amigo T2 rev f/c Rockview Royal T6

21:30 Wimbledon
Lenson Johnny T2 rev f/c Westmead Meteor T5

The only possible fly in the ointment i can see is Stellars Blue in the 21:15, but i rate that very unlikely.

Clear runs will be sufficient.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 32
By:
woodmanchester
When: 09 Mar 13 09:02
Good luck Banana but dont think the pair of them will pay much more than evens, especially the seoond one. You may have to consider straight forecasts?
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 09:05
You'd be surprised what a rev f/c double will pay...
By:
woodmanchester
When: 09 Mar 13 09:08
8/11 and 5/4 surely only pays about £2.20, then its half that going onto the other rev f/c?
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 09:18
Of the 2 dogs in each, i fancy the outsider of those 2 to win...

Green Amigo is pacey enough and Westmead Meteor was very impressive last week.
By:
woodmanchester
When: 09 Mar 13 10:28
I'll be watching tonight. All the best of luck Banana!
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 21:54
Poor run from Amigo... I expected better.
By:
Winja
When: 09 Mar 13 22:03
if im right and your bet had come off you would have won £1.16 for an outlay of £4.00........what a completly pointless waste of time......you could have just backed either of the winners as a single for a better return.....
By:
Clarence Worley
When: 09 Mar 13 22:07
i think he would have got just over a tenner for a 4 pound outlay.
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 22:08
Winj... Your maths are worse than mine
By:
never give up
When: 09 Mar 13 22:10

Mar 9, 2013 -- 4:03PM, Winja wrote:


if im right and your bet had come off you would have won £1.16 for an outlay of £4.00........what a completly pointless waste of time......you could have just backed either of the winners as a single for a better return.....


what are u on winja

By:
Winja
When: 09 Mar 13 22:31
working backwards......9.30 race paid 2.14...split in half as rfc...1.07 x 4.83 (9.15 race divi) = 5.16 = 1.16 profit....is that not correct...
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 22:37
Erm.... No
By:
Winja
When: 09 Mar 13 22:38
how does it work.......
By:
Winja
When: 09 Mar 13 22:44
woodmanchester
8/11 and 5/4 surely only pays about £2.20, then its half that going onto the other rev f/c?


your pal has the same idea of the formula.....
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 22:49
Learn first..... Comment after.

Hth.
By:
the mystery man
When: 09 Mar 13 23:14
and i thought most gamblers knew how to work out a betLaugh,
returns about £10.30.
i.e. would have been the equivalent of a 6/4 winner
By:
patrick starr
When: 09 Mar 13 23:17
No need for that banahan,winja is one of the most helpful people here.

Anyway winja,its 4 x £1 bets,

he gets the first forecast for £1,divi £2.14

in the next leg he has 2 x £2.14 forecasts on each leg of his casts,divi £4.83

payout is £2.14 x £4.83 = £10.33

so basically he got 6/4 his money
By:
never give up
When: 09 Mar 13 23:22

Mar 9, 2013 -- 4:31PM, Winja wrote:


working backwards......9.30 race paid 2.14...split in half as rfc...1.07 x 4.83 (9.15 race divi) = 5.16 = 1.16 profit....is that not correct...


why would u have to split in half?

By:
the mystery man
When: 09 Mar 13 23:26
that's the way to work it out if you placed the bet as a single double with a stake of £1
By:
bannahan
When: 09 Mar 13 23:45
Didn't seem that way to me Patrick
By:
woodmanchester
When: 10 Mar 13 08:02
How do you know Rockview Royal to beat Green Amigo would have paid £4.83?
By:
Winja
When: 10 Mar 13 11:20
cheers patrick..... a simple explanation for a simple fella like me......

woody........the actual 2nd had the same sp as the losing selection so made an assumption...

bannahan  i did say in my thread “if im right” which kind of means im not sure and you cannot seriously take some moral high ground when even at 6/4 the losing bet advised was terrible value................i am 100% sure of that....

Oh........ I had to look up your dopey acronym and found it under the nerds book for keyboard warriors.......heres another i found.......WAC
By:
bannahan
When: 10 Mar 13 17:09
Simple indeed.

Lets clarify then....

You have been on here since '03 and you have the maths knowledge of a 7 year old.

I believe the WAC tag is very firmly with you you clown LaughLaugh PMSL
By:
manxy
When: 10 Mar 13 21:42
as clueless, and as popular on the dogs as the horses i see bananaman.
By:
woodmanchester
When: 10 Mar 13 21:45
Nice fella, imo. Still, i aint got a bad word to say about anyone
By:
irishone
When: 10 Mar 13 21:57
.... woody ... you lying fecker LaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaughLaugh
By:
Winja
When: 11 Mar 13 21:12
Bannahan, your response with regards to my prowess as a mathematician has been used in the wrong context within the given circumstances......the mistake was my misapprehension of the structure of how the reverse forecast double bet was established rather than the incorrect application of a mathematical solution and as such your schadenfreude is comprehensively misplaced............you were correct however in your astute observation that I have been associated with betfair since 2003 and as is generally concurrent with long durations in a specialist sphere one gathers experience of the comings and goings of a certain type of individual and while this is a period in which you may be prolific in your contributions to the forum where your thoughts are aired and shared.....the quality and indeed success of the aforementioned contributions lead me to the understanding that you do not contain the attributes to sustained an equally long period of membership.................i therefore find it relatively simple to ignore your rather derogatory response to me in the same way i would ignore the wayward nature of a blessed child who was without the wherewithal to understand their dysfunctional behavior......however......if you would like to continue a conversation with me in person i can be found at crayford every friday.....just ask the bookmakers or further to your description you may recognise me as the one with the big feet and red nose....
By:
woodmanchester
When: 11 Mar 13 21:55
Dont you two be getting like me and Irish! Crazy. Some long words there Winja. I'm still on the first sentence with my dictionary! LaughWink. I know where to come for my letter of appeal next time i get a parking ticket! Silly
By:
bannahan
When: 12 Mar 13 10:27
Took him over 28hrs to come up with that Laugh

You should spend more time on your maths winj, your use of the English language is not the issue here.
By:
safari guide
When: 12 Mar 13 11:09
Why are you talking to us?
By:
SUNDERLAND GREYHOUND EXPERT
When: 12 Mar 13 11:10
winja you are good at English but rubbish at maths...............only joking mate.
By:
woodmanchester
When: 12 Mar 13 11:13
Sure Winja is good at maths. Think he's a regular on the BAGS theme, so he must be with all that backing/laying stuff. With the forecast double, he probably thought like me the total stake wasnt £4, that's all
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com