Golf
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
After my Solheim Cup mistake I thought it better to ask for some advice ahead of plunging in.
Without revealing too much in advance, I'm trying to see if backing at
1.5, 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 is better or worse than
1.2, 17/1 19/1 26/1 34/1 35/1 42/1 50/1 65/1 65/1 & 100/1
Both outcomes result in a guaranteed win.
My other question is this, is laying at 5.0 on an exchange & backing elsewhere at odds of 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 going to result in free money should the outcome occur (assuming your staking plan elsewhere gave you the same result on all outcomes) ?
Thanks in advance
LOTM
Without revealing too much in advance, I'm trying to see if backing at
1.5, 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 is better or worse than
1.2, 17/1 19/1 26/1 34/1 35/1 42/1 50/1 65/1 65/1 & 100/1
Both outcomes result in a guaranteed win.
My other question is this, is laying at 5.0 on an exchange & backing elsewhere at odds of 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 going to result in free money should the outcome occur (assuming your staking plan elsewhere gave you the same result on all outcomes) ?
Thanks in advance
LOTM
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4
|
By:
The laying at 5.0 which is obviously 4-1 is worse than you backing all of the others as their odds come to approx' 5/2.
So you'd be backing at 5/2 and Laying 4/1 so DO NOT do that. |
|
By:
1.5, 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 is better or worse than
1.2, 17/1 19/1 26/1 34/1 35/1 42/1 50/1 65/1 65/1 & 100/1 Also of the two lines you show the TOP one is better odds. |
|
By:
LOU MACARIS TARTAN B,
Thanks for your help :) LOTM |
|
By:
Without revealing too much in advance, I'm trying to see if backing at
1.5, 14/1 17/1 22/1 28/1 35/1 35/1 & 50/1 is better or worse than 1.2, 17/1 19/1 26/1 34/1 35/1 42/1 50/1 65/1 65/1 & 100/1 Both outcomes result in a guaranteed win. The second line is a big loser 1.2 is 83.3% and all the big prices add up to well over 20% |