|
By:
Needs high lighting . Good point .
|
|
By:
That is poor, well spotted
|
|
By:
and sporting bet - not that anyone prob uses them but never know
|
|
By:
They still lay me golfers vegas , but paltry for horses etc .
|
|
By:
only 69 staert
ryder cup on its way fedex cup on its way do some research before posting |
|
By:
duke? u want them all to pay 4!!!
![]() i have a feeling u read the thread wrong... ![]() |
|
By:
if i was a bookie and was pricing 156 players i would go 1/5 if only 69 players i would go 1/3
|
|
By:
if you think 1/5 is what they should offer for 69 players then for normal events of 156 the place terms should be 1/11
i havent seen you moan about that being poor form |
|
By:
overcomplicating it mate - when 18 of 20 offer better - nice to tell others the benefit of avoiding the other 2.
nothing to do with fairness, just better is better! |
|
By:
and i'm a horseman get 4 at 16 runners, so i'm looking for 16 + payout if it's an even translation
![]() |
|
By:
ahh i get it!! - the posts about only paying 4 places others paying 5 places - NOT the quarter/fifth element
![]() |
|
By:
and i think your mixing up the fractions?!?!?
|