Golf
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
So let me get this straight, Howell was disqualified because the head cover on his driver made it a non conforming club?? Yet Tiger Woods earlier this year purposely improved his lie on the fairway but they deemed it's not sufficient enough for disqualification. That's one of the reasons a lot of people hate watching pro golf - the ridiculous rules and the huge subjectivity and favouritism of the officials.
Show More
To be fair, I don't think any of the officials are favourites.
I would say there is very strong evidence that lots of people hate to watch pro golf the same way lots of people would hate to watch many other things.
saw this fred title and just wanted to see how much it cost bito. My estimate was out by 124k.
it is hard to swallow when the rule book dicates Howell has to be DQ'd for what is essentially a piece of plastic falling off his driver whereas Woods wasnt DQ'd for deliberately dropping the ball in a place that he believed would help him.
I wonder who called the finding?
I wonder who called the finding?
if it's any consolation, surely history tells you he would have faded out of contention as per usual....
no, i thought not!
no, i thought not!
Wie has a 2ft par putt "don't leave it short" is the commentary
in the context of the £100-200k bito lost as a result of this horrendous miscarriage of justice, my wrong thread blooper makes me feel very bad
no worries mary,charles has won me much more than that over the years 
try buying him a decent flat stick with your winnings
Aug 17, 2013 -- 10:23PM, a bitofinterest wrote:
cost me 658K
You put 658K on him to win?
Ridiculous DQ. If it was a correct interpretation of the rules then the rules need to be changed.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539