PA R 3 CONTEST

bob, a year or two ago we were still betting on a regular pgatour event in Mexico or Puerto Rico at least 20 minutes after it had finished and the odds were all over the place.
  Betfair didn't suspend until someone said on the forum that there were a picture of the winner holding the throphy on the tournaments home page.

31k matched on a bit of fun...

31k  Blooming hell. Some angry people i reckon if Harrington given verdict

maybe the Augusta site just saw him stick it to 2 feet and give him it.



two bob event, anyone betting on it needs to have a word with themselves imo!

betfair dont know what to do it seems..!!!!

I think the group behind Byrd hit their teeshots on the last, so Byrd most have finished, one way or the other...

gotta be a tie, Par three comp 'results'  leader board lists BYRD AS TIED 1ST.
Sky leader board behind the real time board on website

those tucking into pod at odds on could get a shock yet

PGA TOUR ‏ @PGATOUR  Reply  Retweet  Favorite · Open
Par 3 Contest cancelled due to inclement weather at Augusta National. Pencil in @JByrdPGA and Padraig Harrington as 2012 champs. #Masters

Just settle it...whats the problem?

Harrington wins...he is already drinking from the cut crystal.

byrd is finished on the masters site however they had scott at -6 earlier

those tucking into pod at odds on could get a shock yet

I only stuck £2 on 5 random players for a bit of fun...

BUT I WILL CRY IF BYRD DOESNT GET GIVEN THE TIE.

It's void or a tie form me.Open it back up BF and lets see the mayhem.

byrd needed a birdie on the last to tie... he made it, this market should be voided ffs

This is hilarious

I backed Chez Reavie with C orals, will I get my stake back? Would they have paid out if I backed Harrington?

Just recieved a call back from c orals as I was writing this and they have said they are not sure as to what they are going to do yet.....

Dazmacccc I lost a pittance on it but it's the principle of the thing. If BF have taken a stane they won't offer a market on "nonsense", then abide by that decision. Hell I remember when BF threatened F1 to stop offering odds on it when Barichello pulled over on the last corner to let Schumacher win. I understand uour point but the company has to protect bettors against these farces.

right now id price it up as 1.8 harrington 2.2 byrd, 1000 ernie els

There will be an official result one way or another. it won't be settled on what Sky say!

its officially a tie, says so on news article of main masters homepage.

classic, same thing happens every year on here with people crying after kids take putts etc. A 2 minute google search will tell you that happens.

harter, there's a big difference as here, everyone  (maybe apart from you) know beforehand that this contest is a farse.

Byrd didn't tap in on the last.

Harrington wins...what is the hold up?

that will teach people to go by the sky pics on the leaderboard for Harrington.

What if you had bet on Webb Simpson or Jerry Pate? Would they have pid out on these? Each way? Surely C orals have to void this, its the only fair thing to do imo.

I guess the key is to only bet on players that don't have kids or aren't immature, supersticious fools. Better yet I'll play bingo or the lottery - it takes more skill.

Had Reavie started ?

There was still some tough finidhing holes for Simpson and Pate...

Reavie level par after 9     no score was registered

Oh well on to the real event. Anyone else like Stanley as a longshot?

obviously its a huge joke, declaring a winner in an event where half of the field didnt finish their rounds! the masters people need a result for their records and tradition etc. as there no way of finishing the contest with people out at 7am tomorrow

shouldnt be money wagered on it, but im laughing my balls off at people backing harrington at odds on

yeah reavie had finished on NS, but i'm praying for a void!!

It should be voided.

if it is a tie then sky should get banned for blatant ramping. theyve said harrington has won at least 5 times already.

Byrd now joint -5

Sky now says its a tie. Obviously that interested in the score at the time

£932 done on harrington at 1.2

i got a lay in on Harrington at 1.10 :)

and now sky says it IS a tie. well beam me up scotty.

i very nearly backed harrington at 1.3, remind me never to believe anything sky say ever again!

I think it should be voided as stephen carr had a fiver on harrington and he's a knob jockey also i bet a fiver on hanson who didnt enven start give me my money bf

gary player seething, was -1 thru 1

I don't think it'll be voided. All bets stand run or not. I'd say personally that it'll be dead heated.

all bets stand run or not, means if the player is up, and he doesnt start then tough, this tournament has been abandoned ffs

03:52 p.m. EDT The Par 3 Contest is completed because of inclement weather. Harrington and Byrd tied for first at 5-under.
03:29 p.m. EDT With a Weather Warning on the course, play has been suspended in the Par 3 Contest.
03:27 p.m. EDT Jonathan Byrd birdies No. 9 to tie Padraig Harrington for the lead at 5-under in the Par 3 Contest.

Sky announced Harrington as the winner about 8:55 are they that far behind?

I think for a change that BF will just do the descent thing and Void. Sky were just not on the ball. Basically were taking no interest in the event whatsoever.

If it was clear cut BF would have settled by now.

Your correct frames. More than just who won in this market to decide over

The par three tournament has been abandonded ffs... voided surely ? but knowing bf they will not want that!

Padraig now in with the tourney director saying he wants it voided

I,d no bet in this but surely if someone only played a hole or two how can they be expected to win the competition,hence if you bet one of them to win you can,t win which is one of the fundamental basis of gambling.Think it should be voided.

***ALL BETS STAND RUN OR NOT***

and I'm not honestly trying to be clever.

It's a dead heat

Yes Billy but I'm sure that rule is for when the tournament is completed and certain players don't turn up.

still not settled...

maybe frames but whether deliberate or not..... that covers it

BF never thought it would be abandoned. No rules on many situations on this market. Just the ***ALL BETS STAND RUN OR NOT*** which is minimal as rules go

If the event had allowed one player to hole his birdie put and then rained off then the meaning of all bets stand run or not becomes meaningless. Interesting to see what decision they come to

Well my bet was just £4 on Simpson @34.0  Layed for £20 @ 3.25. Good for me as a fun bet but d believe it will just be voided.

There's nothing more definitive...

Asterixed and CAPITALS

When has logic ever had any standing where Betfair is concerned

Anyone know what BF's official line is, I backed Harrington

Harrington and Byrd declared winners of par 3 contest,
Difficult call for the betfair boss, rules are rules though and the result has been made Official
TIME TO SETTLE ALL BETS

Just been paid on Harrington !!!!!!!!!

Me too

Load of bollocks all the same

settled as a dead heat

comedy but lesson learned for everyone who had a bet

Commission in the bank.Poor for those who did not get a run.

bollocks really had just had bet on mol who was -2 thru 2 betfair  w a n k er s

@frames. agree not sure the rule has ever been applied in that way

Agree had backed Byrd and Pate and layed Paddy heavily at 1.67 ,1.3 and 1.2 on the back of masters homepage leaderboard.
You win some, you loose some.
complete farce though to list the lads as official Winners which left betfair with their hands tied.

Well a win is a win !

Rain has made this a very open Masters now - will they use lift and place? Will they blow dry the greens?

Anyone had bets settled/voided with the books ?

Won't the rain help the big hitters even more ?

Bad enough admitting I'd had a bet on here.... let alone elsewhere

Mickelson said in his interview that the flags can be attacked and it should be a birdie fest... should be fun

Moral of the story - don't bet on nonsense. Simples.

Apr 4, 2012 -- 4:07PM, SuperFrothy wrote:

Moral of the story - don't bet on nonsense. Simples.

100% correct !!

What a scam this is absolutely ridiculous there was a player 4 under threw 5 holes i had -6 or better didn't even get mclroy to tee off thanks betfair for just cheating me out of my money for best round -5 was in but it should be split with -6 or better since it was possible and players that didnt play should 100% get refunded there staked unless they came in at 4 under or worse as there final score.  SCAM

I was on Scott at 46. Had I known he was going to throw it on purpose I would have donated my 20 bucks to the Salvation Army instead.

i backed 3 players not 1 went out and played. i should get my money back as if a horse does not go in the stalls (does not start) you get refunded whats the difference?

I had no bet on this, and just got in from my footy and am reading this fred through. Its so funny reading all these people crying after losing bets on the par 3 tournament. Its the same every year. They let their kids take putts, hit balls into the water and many try not to win on purpose.

The only questions I have are; if you didnt know what the par 3 tourney is like what the hell are you doing betting on it?

And if you have done any sort of serious dough without even finding out what the Betfair rules are and what the history of the par 3 comp is, then you are probably fairly used to losing money, so the sting wont last long.

i agree it is a fun event but having a bet and them not even starting is not rite. if they go out n lose on purpose that is fine it is all fun. Not getting a run for your money is wrong should be a refund. What about people who backed webb simpson he had every chance with 2 to play

@Marychain shut up how bout you go bet $100 on tiger to win the masters not the par 3 he doesnt tee off and you don't get your money back shut up it doesnt matter if its a fun event or not if the player doesnt get to play you shouldnt have to pay smarten up

@skylerd

1. I wouldnt bet anything like that much on an event that is famous for being a total lottery, a joke and a farce. The only time I have ever bet on this was a few years ago when Tim Clark won, and that was only £5. I would suggest that if you cant wait 24 hours for a proper event to have a serious bet on then you may have a problem.

2. If I did decide a bet on such an event, when it clearly says in the rules "All bets stand, run or not", I certainly wouldnt whine when I did my dough.

I hope you get it all back over the next few days, good luck.

Hopefully Betfair have learnt a lesson as bookmakers have done over the years - do not run a book on a novelty event where no real rules are in place - anyone betting in any event should know what rules they are betting under - if they don't then they simply should not be betting.

***ALL BETS STAND RUN OR NOT***

For those complaining they never got a run for their money, read above.

Muppet Moans. Real bookies would never offer bets on this for 2 reasons:
1-they wouldn't want to deal with the BS afterwards of a contest they know is a joke and
2-the money comes out of their own pockets if someone knew that certain golfers were going to tank it on purpose.

Betfair could care less. As far as they're concerned they made a few quid on commission offering this event and if a bunch of naive bettors lost their money on it because they suspected it was legit then so what? It's a win for Betfair but real bookies would be concerned about losing customer respect and loyalty.

anyone know what c oral have done with this? got £40 on chez reavie i'm thinking it will be void

just looked thru this thread and i am amazed that people bet on it..even you timmy...

yeah so am i! thought reavie was value tho at 80/1 especially for the each way part, usually a player with great wedge game and putter that wins, and usually a short hitter (they tend to be much more accurate with their distance control) like donald, tim clark etc..

praying i'll get my £40 back

If for some reason I was obligated to offer this on BF here's what I would do.

"Player to record the fewest shots in a 9 hole round." That would mean players who tank it like Scott or others who let their kids putt can still win it as long as the total shots by the player or their appointed minion is less than others. I would also refund bets on any golfer who doesn't tee off.

In a way it's no different than the F1 rule of fastest qualifier instead of pole position.

Betfair can't refund bets on some players, it wouldn't be fair to layers.
  It's either all bets stand run or not - or void the whole market.

There is a huge difference in people losing money because it's a fun event and people losing because the weather stopped their selections from playing in the comp.
Marychain says it's the same every year ,I don't recall it being abandoned before.

There was buttons matched on the event.It would not kill BF to refund punters who backed players who did not complete the 9 holes.
Did all the books payout on the tie ?

Quote from Coral;

"The Par 3 at Augusta got called off last night, we have settled on the declared results & returned stakes players who didn't complete round"

Lets hope betfair do the same.


On a side note, as far as the discussion regarding betting on this event goes. I knew full well that this was a fun event, and players playing trick shots, or letting their kids putt is one thing, but when they haven't competed the round, or haven't even played a shot, that's surely a completely different matter.
That being said, I only put a couple of pound on. I'd just like it back so I can stick it on Bubba Watson to win :D

frames - I dont remember it being abandoned before either, but the key point here surely is why the hell would anyone bet anything other than peanuts on a event that is a well-renowned farce?

I agree marychain ,those that did money on players deliberately not trying to win deserve to lose but those who did not get a run should be refunded.

Was and always will be fraught with uncertainty. The "ALL BETS STAND" rule is a full proof safe guard for Betfair.

Just think the page should flash up a big "WARNING" sign as well. I got lucky (although my other £2 punts never left the clubhouse) but there still seems something morally wrong about the whole thing.

Apr 5, 2012 -- 3:37AM, LeighGaskin wrote:

Quote from Coral;"The Par 3 at Augusta got called off last night, we have settled on the declared results & returned stakes players who didn't complete round"Lets hope betfair do the same. On a side note, as far as the discussion regarding betting on this event goes. I knew full well that this was a fun event, and players playing trick shots, or letting their kids putt is one thing, but when they haven't competed the round, or haven't even played a shot, that's surely a completely different matter. That being said, I only put a couple of pound on. I'd just like it back so I can stick it on Bubba Watson to win :D

I remember Betfair refunding bets on that Davydenko fiasco a few years back in Poland when it was clear he purposely lost that tennis match but I don't think they've ever given back players money for anything other than that. I think it's fair to say that Betfair isn't worried about losing the respect of bettors because it's still the best betting option around. As long as they get their commission they're happy to settle any bet as per the "decision of the scorer" whoever that is.

At least you will know never to get involved in this nonsense again.