magoo plz dont confuse the issue.....answer the posted question....think of it as you win regardless of the result or break even disregard other punters but thank u for your imput
magoo plz dont confuse the issue.....answer the posted question....think of it as you win regardless of the result or break even disregard other punters but thank u for your imput
latalomne.... did i say i have discovered something new or revolutionary?
I simply posted a question!
Congratulations latalomne wins to first knob prize!!
latalomne.... did i say i have discovered something new or revolutionary?I simply posted a question!Congratulations latalomne wins to first knob prize!!
Well, the fact you felt the need to include that you've got 25 years experience seemed to suggest you considered yourself to be some sort of gambling deity.....
You cut me deep. Well, the fact you felt the need to include that you've got 25 years experience seemed to suggest you considered yourself to be some sort of gambling deity.....
There is a situation where you can back and lay the same horse to guarantee a profit, but the results of other totally unconnected races will determine whether or not you actually keep your profit, break even, or even make a loss.
There is a situation where you can back and lay the same horse to guarantee a profit, but the results of other totally unconnected races will determine whether or not you actually keep your profit, break even, or even make a loss.
Thank you. Well you have the answer wrong. Pxb was the only one who got it correct. In your OP you say "... regarless of result of the bet" (your spelling) as bet is singular you cannot win or break even unless it's a one horse race.
By the way what is your 25 experience in?
Thank you. Well you have the answer wrong. Pxb was the only one who got it correct. In your OP you say "... regarless of result of the bet" (your spelling) as bet is singular you cannot win or break even unless it's a one horse race. By the way what
ps charlie my grammar leaves alot to be desired but rather than attack my spelling addressing the subject matter is far more constructive!
sports arbitrage tradingps charlie my grammar leaves alot to be desired but rather than attack my spelling addressing the subject matter is far more constructive!
If I had wanted I could have attacked your spelling and grammar but didn't, I merely quoted you and to avoid embarrassment pointed out it was your spelling not mine. I could point out further instances of misspelling and bad grammar but it's not on my agenda.
I did address the subject matter by saying it was a dumb question for a betting exchange. I was rather hoping that your reply about it being obvious that there needed to be more than one bet would be of interest. It wasn't.
Your question/statement is well nigh the most banal ever asked since the inception of the exchange. Congratulations on that. Latolomne nailed it.
Do you honestly think that people on here (the exchange) don't know about trading?
If I had wanted I could have attacked your spelling and grammar but didn't, I merely quoted you and to avoid embarrassment pointed out it was your spelling not mine. I could point out further instances of misspelling and bad grammar but it's not on m
charlie i explained my position quite clearly to latolmne i havnt discovered something revolutionart as stated yet again , i simply posed a question ok if you think the question is banal dont effing comment ok
charlie i explained my position quite clearly to latolmne i havnt discovered something revolutionart as stated yet again , i simply posed a question ok if you think the question is banal dont effing comment ok