Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
YOMOMMA
02 Sep 15 14:34
Joined:
Date Joined: 11 Nov 10
| Topic/replies: 22,195 | Blogger: YOMOMMA's blog
Matchbook added a new 2% withdrawal fee when I already had a substantial amount in my account and have stolen £60 off me.

They have acted like thieves by lying and failing to reply to emails. I phoned to complain and was threatened and told there was nothing I could do.

IBAS have told me they only deal with pricing and settlement disputes. The Gambling Commission said they can not help with 'contractual disputes'!

They are out and out con men. Do not go near them.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 44
By:
Senyatta
When: 02 Sep 15 18:15
that sucks. they should not be allowed apply any fee changes to deposits made before the change of terms. im sure there are many others with even larger balances who will be charged. matchbook must be cleaning up. hope you can get your money back. im sure a lot wouldnt have even played there if the charge was in place at said time
By:
macarony
When: 02 Sep 15 18:39
Have you tried that money saving expert to name and shame this company and its dodgy dealings. It would reach a wider audience.
By:
dave1357
When: 03 Sep 15 17:30
The Gambling Commission said they can not help with 'contractual disputes'!

They are out and out con men.


qft
By:
YOMOMMA
When: 03 Sep 15 17:48
they should not be allowed apply any fee changes to deposits made before the change of terms


Yes totally agree.

I went on Twitter and found someone who helped me get the fee back. Closed my account with them now.
By:
sleepless
When: 07 Sep 15 18:37
@ YOMOMMA.  Seems like you did okay in the end and got out at a good time. Here i was a couple of weeks ago singing their praise and now I am finding out how amateur they really are.

On 29/7 I received an email from then telling me that due to an upgrade, that I would have to make a one off deposit before I could make any future withdrawls. I made that deposit, placed a few small bets, before their site crashed costing me $500 last week. After complaining to a VIP Customer Service staff member, he offered me a "Goodwill Joke" of only $50 subsidy in commission for future bets until recovered.

Finding that unacceptable I responded, but have not heard back in a number of days so I went to withdraw my balance, only to be told that yet again I have to deposit a further $43.00 due to another upgrade, prior to being able to withdraw any funds. It sounds to me like they need the money more than I do.
By:
bingo bongo
When: 07 Sep 15 18:48
I've read before that these are owned by some big gamblers, who put up most of the liquidity. Could be that rather than excluding people who they think will win they just try to annoy them until they leave.
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 07 Sep 15 18:50
Sounds like those emails I used to get from Nigeria, sleepless.
By:
sleepless
When: 07 Sep 15 19:56
It's all starting to seem a bit dodgy to me. I never thought anyone could outdo Betfair with sh!t service, but I was clearly wrong.

Matchbook need to be careful who they p!ss off though since they are not exactly squeeky clean. I don't care what they do to screw over governments and their regulations, but they can leave me alone. I am no snitch but they wouldn't want to pick on the wrong person.
By:
sleepless
When: 07 Sep 15 20:00
@Darlo. Did you have no luck with those Nigerian's. I got a diamond mine and a cute wife from them and all I had to do was give them my bank details.
By:
frog2
When: 08 Sep 15 08:57
I don't know if the owner puts in liquidity or has access to account data on who is winning.

There is something a little disconcerting about an exchange owner also being a bookmaker (e.g. daq or betfair) or a professional punter. When limit orders are left up by punters and the 'house' could access those limit orders and participate in the market themselves.

I do not think there are any laws against this. Obviously in banks you have Chinese walls between the investment banking and the brokerage business to avoid any conflict of interest.

I am not for a moment suggesting any of the betting exchanges are front run by employees or owners or data contained in punters' bets are analysed.
By:
dave1357
When: 08 Sep 15 14:24
unf frog I have no faith at all that the gambling commission understands anything about "modern" gambling.  They ignore cheating at poker and corruption in racing, so I can't see that they would be in the least bothered about an exchange ignoring best execution.
By:
sleepless
When: 08 Sep 15 16:29
If bingo bongo is right about big gamblers owning all(or part thereof) Matchbook, then perhaps they should invest some of their cash on employing a few business people who can create a serious contender to Betfair and a credible business.

I don't know or care where their liquidity comes from and I know nothing about bots and computer technology, but I do know that every time I try to accept a price on Matchbook, that the offer mysteriously disappears during the countdown, and moves out to a more advantageous position for them(as I believe happens at Daq). If I choose to chase that price a couple of times for a few ticks, they finally decide to match it, but by then the alleged smaller commission paid to them is quickly gobbled up and then some, if I accept a worse price on there than what is available on here.
By:
JML
When: 08 Sep 15 18:26
Read once that someone attempted to place a bet that was well covered by the amount of money on offer
but was allowed only a small fraction.

They seem to have a good relation with Oddschecker because they (oddschecker) refuse to take into
account that commission is paid on losing bets.

Strange that Oddschecker prefer to knowingly supply their customers with false information.
By:
frog2
When: 08 Sep 15 20:26
sleepless,
30 seconds on google and you will know who owns the exchange.
By:
sleepless
When: 08 Sep 15 23:49
hi Frog, as is usually the case all I see on google is blah, blah, blah. Half bull sh!t and half hype. The owners are just names to me so the only way to draw my own conclusion is to give them a go. All I want is a fair go and to do business with credible companies on a level paying field. Clearly that is way too much to expect in this industry, or perhaps it is just a sign of the times.

For what it is worth I think Matchbook are no better or worse than others. They all operate offshore for their own questionable benefits and don't give a feck about their customers. So far they have done themselves out of hundreds of dollars in commission while they make no effort to communicate or resolve the issue, so it doesn't serve to benefit either party.

This thing about them expecting multiple deposits, so that they can upgrade their system concerns me, particularly given the current dispute. Cooperation is a 2 way street, as is respect. If they don't give it, they sure as hell won't get any in return from me.
By:
Kerrygold
When: 09 Sep 15 01:24
sleepless their comm is so low how can you go wrong

also they will take a proper bet , if i want 20g or 30g on something - , u will get matched , not all at same price but a reasonable price considering the type of bet and mrkt
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 03:17
Kerrygold are you speaking from experience,

Firstly the commission is 1% per bet, win or lose, not 1% of net profit. If you like to duck in and out of a market and green up both sides, it is easy for commission to exceed 10%.

Secondly comm rate is irrelevant if their site crashes and your bet loses because you can not trade out of your position to create a green book.

Thirdly, they have very limited games, with very limited markets turned in play. Match odds and over/under 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 is all, and if there is more than one big match on at the same time liquidity disappears dramatically. Try trading goal markets when you have 4 or 5 EPL games scheduled at the same time on a Saturday arvo.

Fourth, most times you try to match a bet already in the system, that price conveniently disappears during countdown and adjusts in their favour, further reducing profits if you start chasing their prices and finally, if you have a problem and hope to receive some sort of customer service, well save your time cos just like Betfair, they don't give a feck.

I am more than happy too deal with them, when they deserve my business.
By:
Kerrygold
When: 09 Sep 15 06:51
yeah , i dont trade inplay

more so just punt ..A handicaps , total goals mrkts etc

i find them pretty good , i mean with PC here , got to be at matchbook too and places like pinnacle
By:
NORTH BERWICK
When: 09 Sep 15 12:44
I had no problem with them. Closed my acct now. If i took a bigger price on Betfair i usually won , but if i took the bigger price on Matchbook i invariably lost. I think there are some very smart operators on Matchbook.
By:
dave1357
When: 09 Sep 15 13:10
sleepless - trading on MB is obviously idiotic, how could you think otherwise?
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 13:14
Matchbook have potential, but not under current circumstances. Their site and customer service is crap(but then again so is Betfairs), their number of markets going "in play" are laughable and it appears not to be peer to peer. As Bingo Bongo and Frog seems to be suggesting, if owners are adding liquidity they have a vested interest in scaring off winners, because it is owners money that punters are winning, as compared to peer to peer where Matchbook make a locked in profit regardless of who wins.

I wonder if perhaps the reason offers are removed when they see counter offers coming in is to drive the price out and get matched 3 or 4 per cent better off, so that they can immediately accept the genuine price with Betfair and make an instant 3 or 4 percent over and above commission. I doubt that 1% commission would even cover the cleaners wage(or others would be offering it). Perhaps the same process is being undertaken by a private investor, who knows, but it will scare customers off pretty quick either way.

If they push me out and I am stupid enough to accept a lay for $10,000@1.57 and they can offset that immediately with a lay of 1.54 on Betfair, they lock in an instant profit greater than what they stand to gain from commission. Do that consistently and it will quickly add up. Just saying.

I am sure Matchbook are lurking as has previously been admitted to me, so why not sort it out and show transparency so both parties can get back to making money, instead of wasting time on a forum. Check the view count on this thread alone. That can't be good for business.
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 13:18
Dave1357, thanks for your insightful input. Assuming that I was trading on Matchbook why is that idiotic?
By:
dave1357
When: 09 Sep 15 13:43
because, as you seem to know, the commission structure isn't based on profits. So you could clearly lose money on a trade that would be profitable on BF.
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 13:56
Do you know Dave that if you ask, MB will put you on 3% of net profit. It is just not an option that they promote.
By:
siwaadupa
When: 09 Sep 15 14:30
If you deposit and withdraw without placing bet, what did you expect? They are best @ the moment.
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 14:54
Is that aimed at me, because it is MB who are requesting the deposit and withdrawl in my case to update their system and do not as far as I know expect me to turn it over in those circumstances. However asking me to do it twice due to their incompetence after just screwing me over seems just a tad rude and suspicious,
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 14:56
Has anyone else been asked to go through this process with them twice in a month????
By:
dave1357
When: 09 Sep 15 15:14
ok fair enough sleepless if they do that I apologise
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 15:21
no problem, Dave, that is why the could be a worthy alternative under the right circumstances.
By:
funkymonkey
When: 09 Sep 15 16:47
This is from their website...

Are withdrawals free?

Yes, for the most part, withdrawals from your Matchbook account are free. However, we reserve the right to enforce roll-over (outlined in our terms and conditions) or charge for the transaction, if the commission paid on your betting activity fails to cover the deposit and withdrawal processing costs Matchbook incurs.

That doesn't sound like a blanket 2% withdrawal fee. It seems like they are protecting themselves from people depositing, betting a couple of evens shots and pulling their money, earning less in commission than the cost of the deposit fee.

Does anybody else have any experiences of being charged the 2%?

I only ask as I have used them a lot recently but just kept my balance in there, haven't attempted to withdraw yet.
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 17:27
funkymonkey, I have never been charged a withdrawal fee. I had reasonable turnover without multiple withdrawals though. I drew the same conclusion that unless your commission paid does not cover their bank/admin fees then they reserve the right to charge a 2% processing fee.

Have you received emails from them asking you to make one off deposit and withdrawals to confirm your card details due to an upgrade to their system. I received one on July 29 and I did as they asked, but then I received another email making the same request on September 3 asking me to deposit another $43 for the same reason. I tried to withdraw funds a couple of days ago and they wouldn't let me, until I make that deposit. When i contacted "live chat" they just said that the first time failed at their end so I had to do another one. There is more than enough money in my account so that is not an issue, but I seem to be the only one being asked to make these random deposits for their benefit.
By:
funkymonkey
When: 09 Sep 15 17:34
Sleepless..

I do not play with big money but I do turnover a lot of bets and pretty much everyday of the week. Around 400 in the last month as a rough example.

So I would expect that based on that, they would see me as a regular client but I have never had an email like the one you have described. I would be concerned too if that had happened to me but it hasn't.
By:
sleepless
When: 09 Sep 15 19:45
Cheers Funkymonkey,

I play with bigger money, but certainly no hot shot. I can't imagine that they would charge you for a withdrawal if you bet regularly and don't withdraw all of the time. I assume that they would have to warn you if there are any fees before finalising the transaction. Just get on live chat and ask if you have any concerns.

I just wonder with my problem if it has something to do with the fact that i would be covered by different regulators being from outside the UK, but all they specify is an upgrade to their software, so it should be the same for everyone. Buggered if I know. Sadly, MB haven't even got the decency to respond to my emails.
By:
Darlo Bantam
When: 10 Sep 15 00:03
Were a few complaints about MB on the GT forum a while back: http://www.geekstoy.com/forum/showthread.php?12250-Geeks-Toy-for-Matchbook-com-general-discussion-thread/
By:
siwaadupa
When: 10 Sep 15 00:09
You all gonna place bets on PP soon. So be happy what is whether you like MB withdrawal policy or not.
By:
Kerrygold
When: 10 Sep 15 07:41
north berwick , they would be shrewd enough alright ..they have leans on certain events...they are never far away
By:
sleepless
When: 10 Sep 15 22:45
Thanks for the link Darlo, dig a bit deeper and there are plenty more
By:
JML
When: 11 Sep 15 00:20
Anyone that remembers Sporting Options will stay well clear of this mob.
By:
sleepless
When: 11 Sep 15 01:09
JML - Are Sporting Options the same mob as WSEX
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com