May 2, 2014 -- 3:24AM, logroller wrote:
29000 posts and u cant convert a fractional odd...................please
it might be an unusual question. I was just curious why bookmakers use say 5/6 , when the more precise term is 83/100. But it clears it up for me now. Would it be wrong for a bookmaker to say offer odds of 11/100? (when the UK odds offer from a soccer game last night was offering 1/9?
May 2, 2014 -- 11:34PM, West Coast Eagles wrote:
May 2, 2014 -- 3:24AM, logroller wrote:29000 posts and u cant convert a fractional odd...................pleaseit might be an unusual question. I was just curious why bookmakers use say 5/6 , when the more precise term is 83/100. But it clears it up for me now. Would it be wrong for a bookmaker to say offer odds of 11/100? (when the UK odds offer from a soccer game last night was offering 1/9?
Because bookies odds are 5/6. 5/6 does not equal 83/100, although in decimal terms they appear to be the same. And except for the sake of pennies they are about the same.
May 3, 2014 -- 1:46AM, Darlo Bantam wrote:
No.If you bet at 1.03 you're getting fractional odds of 3/100. 1/33 is - perhaps you may claim splitting hairs - but a decimal odds of 1.0333333.Try betting £100 at 3/100 or 1.03. You win £3.Bet £100 at 1/33. You win £3.33.At such short odds, the difference between the two odds is 10 per cent in terms of winnings.The example above of 5/6 or 83/100, the difference for £100 is £83 winnings of £83.33, so not quite as noticable, though still different.
have a look at this website: http://www.isfa.com/odds-probability-chart.php . So I think the correct term for a 1.03 shot is 3/100 (which was what I thought initially). That table suggests that the fractional term is 1/33 for a 1.03 shot , which I believe is wrong (Unless you round it to 2 decimals)