Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
West Coast Eagles
01 May 14 23:33
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Mar 07
| Topic/replies: 44,557 | Blogger: West Coast Eagles's blog
I was having a look at the table from an online source the other day

Was curious to know would it be right if I said Fractional odds of 83/100 is the same as 1.83? I understand the fractional odds of 5/6 and that it is equivalent to 2 decimal places is 1.83.
Pause • Switch to Standard View Fraction to Decimal Odds conversion
Show More
Loading...
Report Capt__F • May 2, 2014 12:23 AM BST
serious ?
Report logroller • May 2, 2014 3:24 AM BST
29000 posts and u cant convert a fractional odd...................please
Report TheInvestor2 • May 2, 2014 10:38 PM BST
Fractional odds +1 = European odds.
83/100 Fractional
83/100+1 =1.83 European.
Report West Coast Eagles • May 2, 2014 11:34 PM BST

May 2, 2014 -- 3:24AM, logroller wrote:


29000 posts and u cant convert a fractional odd...................please


it might be an unusual question. I was just curious why bookmakers use say 5/6 , when the more precise term is 83/100. But it clears it up for me now. Would it be wrong for a bookmaker to say offer odds of 11/100? (when the UK odds offer from a soccer game last night was offering 1/9?

Report Darlo Bantam • May 2, 2014 11:49 PM BST

May 2, 2014 -- 11:34PM, West Coast Eagles wrote:


May  2, 2014 --  3:24AM, logroller wrote:29000 posts and u cant convert a fractional odd...................pleaseit might be an unusual question. I was just curious why bookmakers use say 5/6 , when the more precise term is 83/100. But it clears it up for me now. Would it be wrong for a bookmaker to say offer odds of 11/100? (when the UK odds offer from a soccer game last night was offering 1/9?


Because bookies odds are 5/6. 5/6 does not equal 83/100, although in decimal terms they appear to be the same. And except for the sake of pennies they are about the same.

Report U.A. • May 3, 2014 12:50 AM BST
OF course the other reason is with fractional odds it was much more difficult for the punter to work out the overround and so how much the bookie was charging/ripping you off. People were not going to sit down and figure out if a footy match was priced up at 8/11, 9/4 and 4/1 whether that was a fair price or not, especially before the internet. If you want to rip people off then you need to make your charging structure as complicated as possible.

It used to happen all the time in the finance industry. Have you ever tried to compare costs for gas and electricity companies? Good luck if you have.
Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 1:10 AM BST
I think for me, terms like: 1/9, 1/8, 1/6, 2/9, 2/7, 4/11, 4/9, 8/15, 4/7, 8/13, 4/6, 8/11, 5/6, 10/11 are used so widely in betting circles that they have become the 'norm'. I honestly think in this modern world of technology and betting, alot of the younger generation if you asked them those fractional odds as mentioned (im making a generalisation) wouldn't know or how to convert it to decimal form. (Yes I do know its an easy process to calculate )
Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 1:16 AM BST
Another term I missed out is 1.03, Fractional Term 3/100, Fractional Odds 1/33
Report Darlo Bantam • May 3, 2014 1:32 AM BST
Except again 1/33 does not equal 3/100. And the tiny difference actually for larger sums is much more stark than the example above.
Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 1:42 AM BST
Would I then be right in saying the proper naming for 1.03 would be the 'Fractional Term' is 3/100? but the 'Fractional Odds' is 1/33?
Report Darlo Bantam • May 3, 2014 1:46 AM BST
No.

If you bet at 1.03 you're getting fractional odds of 3/100. 1/33 is - perhaps you may claim splitting hairs - but a decimal odds of 1.0333333.

Try betting £100 at 3/100 or 1.03. You win £3.
Bet £100 at 1/33. You win £3.33.

At such short odds, the difference between the two odds is 10 per cent in terms of winnings.

The example above of 5/6 or 83/100, the difference for £100 is £83 winnings of £83.33, so not quite as noticable, though still different.
Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 2:12 AM BST

May 3, 2014 -- 1:46AM, Darlo Bantam wrote:


No.If you bet at 1.03 you're getting fractional odds of 3/100. 1/33 is - perhaps you may claim splitting hairs - but a decimal odds of 1.0333333.Try betting £100 at 3/100 or 1.03. You win £3.Bet £100 at 1/33. You win £3.33.At such short odds, the difference between the two odds is 10 per cent in terms of winnings.The example above of 5/6 or 83/100, the difference for £100 is £83 winnings of £83.33, so not quite as noticable, though still different.


have a look at this website: http://www.isfa.com/odds-probability-chart.php  . So I think the correct term for a 1.03 shot is 3/100 (which was what I thought initially). That table suggests that the fractional term is 1/33 for a 1.03 shot , which I believe is wrong (Unless you round it to 2 decimals)

Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 2:18 AM BST
http://www.ukhorseracingtipster.com/FractionalToDecimalOdds.htm  this website is right....
Report YOMOMMA • May 3, 2014 8:47 AM BST
west cost eagles did u skip maths lessons when u were at skool.
Report West Coast Eagles • May 3, 2014 11:00 AM BST
I didn't finish Grade 12 and I wasn't smart enough to go to university
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com