|
By:
If the management are bankers, they better be mindful of this: just because the PC payers hate them, doesn't change the fact that they are in partnership with them. In fact, in the case of 60% PC payers, Betfair is the senior partner! Now many people who pay the Premium Charge at 20% and 40% are innocent punters, just collateral damage. But some of those paying 60% are engaged in genuinely harmful practices. So Betfair is enabling eg 'shell and pea merchants' by implementing a manifestly unfair in-running delay, and taking the majority of the profit from this rip-off.
Ever heard of PPI? |
|
By:
"It is a greedy money grab"
Pretty much sums it up really, and absolute PR disaster. And putting the shareholders over the customer ! Lost all the focus of what betfair was all about in the beginning. Should make the PC more fairer at least - and make sure it doesn't also target innocent punters, and charging anything over 20% is unadulterated greed. If the other site do eventually gain more traction - and no PC - they could become a realistic competitor, and betfair won't have a monopoly on the exchange market. Interesting article but will they care (?) |
|
By:
been over at purple since june after 3 months paying the pc, the 3% commission makes up for liquidity on some markets, but it is improving and i hope it continues to do so. they can shove there pc charge up there arse, they couldn't care less about the customer and i for one, wouldn't come back even if they stopped it...
|
|
By:
I think you would Tin and let's hope they do.
|
|
By:
It´s a long way to go for the purple one to really compete. There is very few markets on some sports.
|