Has anyone had luck following statistical rating systems? My research has so far resulted in the following ratings: http://giorgostzampanakis.pythonanywhere.com/ratings/ . What do you think?
It looks very good and you have clearly put a lot of work into it. Next thing you need to do is calculate match odds, get old betfair data and see if it's profitable.
It looks very good and you have clearly put a lot of work into it. Next thing you need to do is calculate match odds, get old betfair data and see if it's profitable.
It looks very good and you have clearly put a lot of work into it. Next thing you need to do is calculate match odds, get old betfair data and see if it's profitable.
It looks very good and you have clearly put a lot of work into it. Next thing you need to do is calculate match odds, get old betfair data and see if it's profitable.
Just added tennis data as well. I don't have as much tennis data as I do snooker, but hopefully it will still be interesting. If anyone can send me some more data I would appreciate it.
Just added tennis data as well. I don't have as much tennis data as I do snooker, but hopefully it will still be interesting. If anyone can send me some more data I would appreciate it.
did u post the same link on the sbrforum? as for the rating, can you explain how does it work? I'm just not able to 'read' it or understand what if means.
did u post the same link on the sbrforum? as for the rating, can you explain how does it work? I'm just not able to 'read' it or understand what if means.
The rating is a measure of the player's merit. You can select exactly two players so that their relative ratings are translated to winning odds. This should help you "read" it :-)
The site is now also available at www.statsfair.com .
The rating is a measure of the player's merit. You can select exactly two players so that their relative ratings are translated to winning odds. This should help you "read" it :-)The site is now also available at www.statsfair.com .