General Betting
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Right, this doesn't make sense to me.
The Sharapova Peng market has been liquid on Sharapova for most of the match but someone managed to get matched at 2.34 on Peng.
That would indicate that cross matching is off, but I'm seeing inverse odds being put up on Peng's line based on the money on Sharapova (confirmed by comparing with the "raw" data via the API)
however the inverse odds are only appearing on one side on Peng's line.
So the big unmatched 1.01 lay on Sharapova is appearing as an unmatched back at 110 on Peng, but the 1.02 unmatched back on Sharapova is not appearing on Peng's line.
any explanations?
The Sharapova Peng market has been liquid on Sharapova for most of the match but someone managed to get matched at 2.34 on Peng.
That would indicate that cross matching is off, but I'm seeing inverse odds being put up on Peng's line based on the money on Sharapova (confirmed by comparing with the "raw" data via the API)
however the inverse odds are only appearing on one side on Peng's line.
So the big unmatched 1.01 lay on Sharapova is appearing as an unmatched back at 110 on Peng, but the 1.02 unmatched back on Sharapova is not appearing on Peng's line.
any explanations?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 3
|
By:
isn't a 1.01 lay the equivalent of a 100.0's back ? and not 110...
just saying Dstyle ( I know that doesn't answer ur question , which i also want to know ) |
|
By:
soz Dstyle, what I mean is a 1.01 lay is the mathematical equivalent of a 101.0 back, not 110 back
|
|
By:
sorry - of course you're right: 1.01 unmatched backs do appear as 100s to back on the other side.
|