No one can answer the question because its looking like the Sports book project has been put on hold until the governments blueprints for its new gambling tax can be eye-balled as moving retro into 2nd party betting instead of purely staying in 3rd party sports exchange market means BF will be classified as a traditional bookmaker releasing them from some of the advantages in tax qualifications they have since gained from, seems like they will be taking on more than the backers risk with this radical move, long term....
p.s this statement is my own opinion and not in anyway relative to BF policies publicly released.
No one can answer the question because its looking like the Sports book project has been put on hold until the governmentsblueprints for its new gambling tax can be eye-balled as moving retro into 2nd party betting instead of purely staying in 3rd pa
one hopes that accounts of customers can be in the future kept serparate if wishing to take on BF as the layer than taking on other customers on a purely exchange basis so as too maintain fairness in both winning and losing as is not the case with all other tradional bookmaers.
one hopes that accounts of customers can be in the future kept serparate if wishing to take on BF as the layer than taking on other customers on a purely exchange basis so as too maintain fairness in both winning and losing as is not the case with al