Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
john_Nap
27 Nov 11 21:25
Joined:
Date Joined: 25 Oct 11
| Topic/replies: 3 | Blogger: john_Nap's blog
Hi, I wondered if anyone had done much work or had any success with cross market arbs, maybe using asian handicaps. Constructive comments only - thanks John.
Pause • Switch to Standard View Cross Market Arbs
Show More
Loading...
Report TheInvestor2 • November 27, 2011 11:20 PM GMT
Yeah, pure arbitrage is tricky though, as it tends to be well botted.

My initial strategies on Betfair (football) were purely technical, and purely based on the odds in relation to each other. I wasn't watching the matches I was betting on.
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 12:53 AM GMT
I'm open to correction, but basically, there are no cross market arbs anymore.

Cross market arbs (of the simple risk free variety) have been eliminated by the betfair cross matching algorithm or whatever it's called.
Report brendanuk1 • November 28, 2011 1:08 AM GMT
cross matching doesnt work across markets shirley? when did that come in?
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 1:32 AM GMT
Cross-market as well as cross-selection virtual prices and matching were part of the original plan as outlined by bot. Many moons ago. I've not seen it mentioned much since, but I assume it was phased in long ago. And don't call me shirley!
Report Trevh • November 28, 2011 1:38 AM GMT
Fred (I won't call you shirley) there's still lots of cross market arbs available.
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 2:00 AM GMT
Trevh, that's cool. I was obviously looking in the wrong places when I last checked (been quite a while but it was football CS, GS, and U/O etc that I looked at).

Would you go so far as to give an example where cross-market arbs may be witnessed?
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 2:27 AM GMT
I think I may have got hold of the wrong end of the stick.

Are we talking about intra-exchange cross-market arbitrage or traditional arbitrage involving betfair and one or more bookmakers?
Report brendanuk1 • November 28, 2011 2:51 AM GMT
think its just different betfair markets, U/O & CS etc
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 1:00 PM GMT
That's what I was thinking brendan. Which type are you referring to john_Nap and Trevh?
Report ror • November 28, 2011 1:13 PM GMT
cross market arbs are extremely hard to find given that you'll be effectively charged the commission on the gross not the net profit, which would mean you would need a large deviation in prices!

Betfair cross-matching is about matching across different results in the same market as far as I've seen any evidence of.


Personally I find it better to try to work out which of the odds is the 'wrong' price, and use that and then hope that market corrects to the other.

I also think there is a lot of opportunity for looking at prices in the overs markets in football. For example you'll sometimes see odds that suggest over 1.5 is 1.3 and over 2.5 is 2.5 or something, implying a huge (unrealistic) probability of exactly 2 goals. (This also sometimes then disagrees with the correct score market for 2-0,1-1,0-2 combined).

In that case you can dutch under 1.5 and over 2.5, but again the commission on turnover can really hurt this, so you have to be very confident the market is wrong.

Better is to try to arb with a high street* bookie. That way you only get charged commission in one direction, and if you win on betfair you get to pay a decent amount of commission, reducing future PC charges, and if you lose you get a good dose of implied commission, reducing future PC charges, and effectively have made a quick withdrawl from betfair with some profit.

*Internet version of ofc.
Report Ghetto Joe • November 28, 2011 1:20 PM GMT
Cross matching was originally brought in under the guise of providing liquidity to inter related markets, Fred. Cross market arbs do crop up not sure if thats due to cross matching being turned off at times, but it's hard to find cross market arbs that'll cover comms for most of us.
Report Fred! • November 28, 2011 2:16 PM GMT
You've a better memory than I Joe. After reading some posts on here the other year (and forgetting about cross-matching) I wrote a bot that looked for quite a few different cross-market arb scenarios on football. Running over several days it didn't find any arbs that would even cover 2% commission.
Report Methane_Magnet • November 28, 2011 2:19 PM GMT
Even though it is good for us (Laugh) - When they first brought it in they "forgot" to tell us about it Blush
Report Methane_Magnet • November 28, 2011 2:22 PM GMT
Still waiting for a response to my question at the time: If it's best execution - how are you making money from it?

But nothing in my in-box yet Cry
Report ror • November 28, 2011 2:30 PM GMT
Among other things: Rounding errors. You can quite often squeeze out extra pennies by using odd bet amounts (esp when laying) so you get an extra penny for no extra liability.

What happens to that penny if you don't optimise?

Someone on here once had a chart which said which "side" to bet on for each tick, i.e. which was the pure odds and which got shafted by rounding, but that's going quite far.
Report colonelll • November 28, 2011 2:46 PM GMT
i think there is a cross market matching working or the markets due to bots, i guess, are very efficient. i wrote a bot to find opportunities in CS and match odd however the difenrce in odds were not sufficent to cover commission.
Report TheInvestor2 • November 28, 2011 3:52 PM GMT
Yes ror, also, in a two runner market with cross matching on, you should never bet at odds of 1.04, 1.05, 108 or 1.1, always bet the inverse at 26, 21, 13.5 and 11 and you have a better chance getting a better price.

For instance if you back 1.04, you will get 26 for the inverse. If you lay 26, you might get some 22 or 25 or whatever.

Little improvements at the margin.
Report ror • November 28, 2011 4:07 PM GMT
Yup, very important when trading the end of cricket games investor, when odds are often that short for long periods.

However, as a £2 staker, I'd often love to lay 22 rather than backing 1.04 but it's way beyond what my balance and (self imposed) liability limits would take, or isn't compatible with keeping any 'green' I've built up.

I usually just abstain when odds get short, but one day I'll be a high volumer I hope. I need more confidence first though, I've ignored some spectacular 1.04 shots recently. 4% really is nothing to be sniffed at and not taking those chances separate the profitable from the grinding even players imo.
Report askari1 • November 29, 2011 12:45 PM GMT
The other big reason to take intra-betfair cross-market 'arbs' (even at breakeven) that no one has mentioned is minimising comm.

Having said that, I don't see any pure arbs and will only take a position on 'implied wrong odds' when I have a strong view.
Report Alex the old wrinkled retainer • December 1, 2011 6:30 PM GMT
I am pleased to see that you took my advice and posted the same issue here John.  It is ok, you can thank me later.

The fact is that cross market arbs do appear but not with sufficient volume to share them around.  Even if I did find a high volume break even cross market arb then it would be snapped up if I told you.
Report viva el presidente! • December 1, 2011 6:37 PM GMT
as investor says, they exist but bots are generally all over them. and people running those bots tend to be on lower commission than the average punter, so unless you're on 2% they can break even at prices which will lose you money.

in other words, if you're hoping to find any sitting there waiting for you you're likely to be disappointed.
Report Fred! • December 2, 2011 1:15 AM GMT
Sod the facts. Conjecture is good enough for me. Now where should I point my bots?
Report TheInvestor2 • December 2, 2011 1:51 AM GMT
Odds     Stake(£)     Bid type     Placed     Profit/loss(£)
23.00     16.00     Lay     30-Nov-11 22:10     16.00
36.26     15.00     Back     30-Nov-11 22:10     -15.00

That was a perfect cross market arb.
Report TheInvestor2 • December 2, 2011 2:03 AM GMT
^
If that's all I did (manually), I don't think I'd make any decent money though.
Report abolo • December 2, 2011 2:11 AM GMT
Well 3 more like that and you can buy a pint
Report bf_fananatic • December 2, 2011 1:31 PM GMT
There are definite algorithms present in market movement and boundaries on the betfair exchanges, It is also noticed that favorites are sent to sync more with industry prices but hardly ever plunge below the competition, cross market trading is much more difficult because of these extra controls, if you observe when middle priced runners have been brought down in price by weight of money and yet don't seem to descend past the industry equivalent price as soon as the race reaches start time and there is a let up in betting amounts these prices can rebound out a number of points as if some mechanism was imparting a bias against the price being pushed in, the effect is clear and quite interesting.
Report bf_fananatic • December 2, 2011 1:38 PM GMT
It would be very interesting to know just how much code and what type goes into market controls on a betfair exchanges as knowing the mechanisms can reveal its benefits and achilles heals to bot programmers.
Report TheInvestor2 • December 2, 2011 4:56 PM GMT
abolo
Date Joined: 24 Jun 11
Add contact | Send message
When: 02 Dec 11 02:11
Joined:
Date Joined: 24 Jun 11
| Topic/replies: 2,922 | Blogger: abolo's blog
Well 3 more like that and you can buy a pint



Well if you did this a thousand times, you could expect to make an average of between £5.85 and £8.65 gross per arb, depending on which price is correct as a lay win wins me loads and the profit from the arb is not evenly green.

Taking 23 as correct price, I win £1.00 95.65% of the time and £176.90 4.35% of the time.
Report abolo • December 2, 2011 5:19 PM GMT
thx for the explanations, i'm sure you're doing fine, it was just for the joke
Report TheInvestor2 • December 2, 2011 9:58 PM GMT
Yes abolo, cheers! Cool
Report Supersynico • December 2, 2011 10:15 PM GMT
There are definite algorithms present in market movement and boundaries on the betfair exchanges, It is also noticed that favorites are sent to sync more with industry prices but hardly ever plunge below the competition, cross market trading is much more difficult because of these extra controls, if you observe when middle priced runners have been brought down in price by weight of money and yet don't seem to descend past the industry equivalent price as soon as the race reaches start time and there is a let up in betting amounts these prices can rebound out a number of points as if some mechanism was imparting a bias against the price being pushed in, the effect is clear and quite interesting.
_______________________


i'm not a stupid person but everything u just typed when right over my head
Report Trevh • December 3, 2011 12:40 AM GMT
Supersynico, have you heard the expression 'bs baffles brains'?
Report brendanuk1 • December 3, 2011 8:24 PM GMT
LaughPlain
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com