If you're a pc3 player

my PS3 has the YWOD screen

I would guess

1) 10%
2) 30%
3) 10%
4) 50%

Trading and gambling are hard to separate for me though as if I have something at about fair price then I will market make (trading), after which I almost always get out of line with the market and end up exposed (gambling).

I actually wish I knew the answer to this question myself regarding the separation of gambling/trading that Bayes talks about above, but I will hazard a guess:

1) 0%
2) 0%
3) 50%
4) 50%

Same as Bayes, trading and gambling are blurred for me.

1&2) 5%
3&4) 95%

Although I haven't paid any pc yet, I am one of the 480.

1) 10%
2) 10%
3) 30%
4) 50%

Lol, my bots must be a swarm!

Question for Feck:

Let's say you estimate that a particularly magnificent animal has a 50% chance of winning a race, so you back this animal to win at 2.2.

Later (but still before the race has started) the price drops to 1.8. Do you then refuse to lay the same animal out of principle?

Take both bets if they are both value.

I dont pay PC but

1) 90%
2) 10% but only on significant price moves (Such as Mr Andersons suggestion)
3) -1%
4) -2%

just branching into the IR space, and losing (for now)

1)35%
2)0%
3)65%
4)0%

You don't add up to 100, Mag.

not yet a pc3 payer but where does laying a book or trading on a long term market as it is being affected by short term events fit into these categories (e.g. betting on the snooker world champ winner market while games are in-play)? this seems a kind of middle ground between in-running and pre-event to me.

DrWho tells me that for him is used to be:

1) 0
2) 0
3) 100
4) 0

but now is:

1) 100

This is because the in-play horse racing markets have changed significantly over the past year for a number of reasons. Therefore, to keep ahead of the curve he's had to adapt and come up with new ideas.......