|
By:
Just needs a lay side now TheInvestor and it's paradise time. (with the queue hidden)
|
|
By:
exchange are both very stoopid sometimes, they forget most important thing is keep simples - most peoples are very stoopid and just want a simple bets on their choices.
|
|
By:
Are purple taking the bets themselves or is it matched on the exchange with commission taken into account with the prices displayed being slightly worse.
It looks like Betfair without Market depth and B+L ticked, just that they've taken the commission as an average value in advance. |
|
By:
Exchanges' problem is that they find it hard to attract the liquidity on the lay side to match recreational price-takers on the back side.
Anything an exchange does (in its core sports product) has to be understood in terms of getting this money in place w/out risk to itself. |
|
By:
Taking the bets themselves with an obscene margin.
Had a look at prices earlier. Purple: Hearts 6.2, Spurs 1.62 Purple bookie Bet1: Hearts 5.5 Spurs 1.57 on bookie So a 5% comm payer would be better off betting on the exchange. |
|
By:
Interesting then.
Wherever they're taking their prices from (I'm sure they'll say their exchange if asked), they need to be confident that there's enough liquidity to make them accurate-ish. |
|
By:
it's for the donkey who don't understand back and lay...
|
|
By:
Betfair already has that though nairda, without seeding themselves (yet)
|
|
By:
That's one example. At least there are no 2 quid bots irritating punters, and I'm sure one will look about to see where the best value is.
|
|
By:
* for the investor.
|
|
By:
yes...and didn't **** as well....1bet was there months ago,they just now given it a new name and green background
|