Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Mr.Angry
13 Jul 11 21:17
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Jan 11
| Topic/replies: 4,564 | Blogger: Mr.Angry's blog
Would Betfair have survived if it launched with the Super PC?

"5% of profits belong to Betfair."
"20% of profits belong to Betfair."
"40% of profits belong to Betfair."
"50% of profits belong to Betfair."
"60% of profits belong to Betfair."

My personal opinion is that it wouldn't have made it through the first year.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 32
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 13 Jul 11 21:51
Flutter would've taken them over although that would've happened anyway if the flutter backers had balls.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 13 Jul 11 22:01
Mr Angry
If there had been inflation adjusted annual net profit thresholds to those bands of charges, maybe it would have.
After all, one of the very major gripes on here is that BF is now looking at lifetime profit aggregates to implement the current thresholds. That appears to many to be very unfair, and represents moving the goalposts after the game has already well and truly started.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 14 Jul 11 01:25
no, it wouldn't. that's the core of the moral argument against it.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 01:39
I'm missing the thrust of your response Viva.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 01:42
the reality is that for the exchange winner there is no malta to escape this form of taxation and one cant help feeling betfair are opening the backdoor for the future taxation of all british gambling winners with this premium charge practise and if that happens we can thank the betfair model for it!
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 01:49
Taxed at source.
Ooh that hurts always.
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 14 Jul 11 01:49
when you get past the self-interest, the only moral argument against the PC with any force is that it's an abuse of a de facto monopoly position - which could only be built up by initially not imposing the charge or even intimating at it.

it's in some respects the equivalent of tescos opening in a high street driving everyone else out of business, then massively increasing prices in the knowledge that it's going to be extremely difficult for competition to reetablish itself.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 01:51
Sounds pretty Machiavellian to me Viva.
Did the founders really think this far ahead when setting up their original pricing structure ?
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 01:57
very true, i am beginging to believe that many years ago the 2 chaps that dreamed up betfair being largely small professional gamblers themselves hatched a plan that instead of struggling to find winners lets make an attractive platform with little margins, let the players prosper then x years down the line hit the big guys with huge charges , if that wasnt there intention it sure looks like its going to be there legacy
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 01:58
;-)
By:
viva el presidente!
When: 14 Jul 11 02:01
with hindsight, my guess would be: not specifically, but generally yes. ie, that if they reached a point that they were a mature business with an effective monopoly, it was always their intention to milk more profits out of the site by increasing charges one way or another.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:03
Let's all ask them then ? How though ?
An open letter to the RP perhaps?
Presumably they don't bother to read and post on this forum.
Perhaps if any of us sees either of them in any taxhaven watering holes this summer, confront them on this ( but at least soften your approach by buying them a fes sherbets first) ?.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:06
yep it looks very much like that to me too an everyone else, milking is after all a very productive business plan especially when you own the only milker in town but at the rate of 60% is it not a case that the old milker is getting made into juicy sirloin stakes soon and the farmers going to retire early!
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:06
"-- a few sherbets ---"
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:07
Makes your t!ts hurt doesn't it ?
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:10
lol yes with bulldog clips
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:13
Stop it puhlease.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:13
ive heard a rumour that betfair are making a sequel to babe and babe 2, babe in the city, this time the cute little pig runs into a bacon slicer.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:15
thats 500 little bigs at 50 pence a slice, come here little piggys lol
By:
u25k
When: 14 Jul 11 02:16
very good question. The question itself answers how wrong betfair policy is.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:18
But your point I assume is that they will still be pigs and will eventually grow up to be biggies and so on and so on.
But BF owns the pig slicer, and so good business for them methinks.
By:
FINE AS FROG HAIR
When: 14 Jul 11 02:19
Pig slicer, bacon slicer whatever you want.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:24
mind you betfair isnt the only farm around is it and maybe some of the fat piggys will vote with thee trotters and trot too the other farm, with that concept in mind any level headed exchange capitalist will understand that if they want to recoup there bf super charge losses then simply bet on both sites to create an offset providing that the other firm doesnt have a lock out policy on regular winners!
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:25
a tale of two pigs
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 02:34
if one thinks about it, with the current economic climate and the fact that the other exchange company is attracting possibly more of the new customer market then the only viable roads for betfair company profit expansion are 1, obtain more global markets in more countries  2, expand betting porfolio, 3, take back half of the winnings of the best customers. the last option is only to be used as last resort in the light of the first two stalling!
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 14 Jul 11 10:46
Re the pc always being the plan, it's hard to imagine that anyone who thought making a non-runner a losing bet and charging traders and cheats as little as 5% of their lifetime profit was a good idea would have such foresight.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:16
hang on a minute, the very idea that too claim all profit making betfair customers are either bookies, traders or cheats is a form of manipulation and is used totally to justify what is a form of account purgery. i personally have yet to engage an exchange with the data i have researched for many years on my love of greyhound racing form and prediction modeling but with the kind of abuse potential sucessful betfair customers will be receiving from the company i wonder if all the hard work i have done is worth it as i never envisaged i would be handing the majority over too betfair.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:33
it seems the best betfair customers will be treated the same as those who bought shares in the company and will lose money greatly to betfairs advantage, the original betfair" home of winners" concept is dying but the dream lives on and if betfair fails its self and its customers i hope another company learns from there mistakes and the monopoly ends with or without betfair the exchange working business model will evolve and prosper.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:36
betfair are banking heavily that they are the only true horse in the exchange race but rest assured if they fall on any of the last hurdles then another horse will takes its place in the winners enclosure
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:44
what would be a fairer system is to evaluate the way any consistant winner on betfair makes there money and in mind that something should be paid too betfair have a vote on betfair as too who gets charged what. here is my charging model that is fairer

1.....cheats = lifetime ban, assets frozen
2.....traders = %40 pc , cosistantly hammering the servers and raiding the margins
3.....bookmakers = %40 , using betfair as an aid too bookmaking
4.....general speculators = %25 , the very people that fit the majority of punters on betfair
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:52
if betfair is truly fair then they should start disciminating and investigating who makes what and how, its not rocket science and most honest punters will glady co-operate openly with betfair, betfair is being too remote and dogmatic and if it doesnt do some proper public relations work then it will
further alienate the majority of punters from betfair and tarnish there reputation.

it is time for betfair to embrace its true ideals and its followers and tie its unbilical cord,it is born, it lives, but now it must learn to walk with giants, to ask and cry, and then one day it can run when it has learned too walk first.
By:
harechaser6
When: 14 Jul 11 11:57
perhaps betfair should lend an ear too the people that have followed its dream instead of the other companys and investors that are pawing and sleeping with it for it is the people that ultimately will vote with there money, take heed
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com