We are a group of horse racing professionals. We seek someone to organise a group of people to follow us around the racecourses monitoring our bets. Once these shadows discern the horse we're drip feeding money on they will jump ahead of us and mirror our bets with those bookmakers we haven't yet placed bets with. In return for arranging this the successful applicant will receive 40% of our profits as well as whatever he/she arranges with the shadows.
Apply to
Feck N. Eejit The State Hospital, Carstairs, Lanark ML11 8RP
Feck do you know will the 40-60% kick in next wednesday for this current weeks activity , or will it kick in the following week for activity starting on the 18th july.
Feck do you know will the 40-60% kick in next wednesday for this current weeks activity , or will it kick in the following week for activity starting on the 18th july.
feck...bets on an exchange....complains it not a bookie.......
feck.....buys some orange juice....and complains it's not apple.....
feck.....buys a horse....complains it's not a cow......
such is the world of feck.....
feck...bets on an exchange....complains it not a bookie.......feck.....buys some orange juice....and complains it's not apple.....feck.....buys a horse....complains it's not a cow......such is the world of feck.....
Since I started back I've noticed how much worse this has got. It's particularly bad in low liquidity races. I drip feed in e.g. £300 @ 12.0 (presumably I'm not the only one betting it) and a bet suddenly appears mirroring my bet asking for say £500 (there was a 50K bet last night at Yarmouth). I take it whoever's doing it doesn't want the bat matched but, because of the money movement, is confident it isn't going to be snaffled and is quite happy for it to act as a book end. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's assisting scalping or he's hoping to force me into accepting lower odds that he can sell back after removing the book end. The tragedy is they wouldn't even have to make any great change to the interface to stop this parasitic behaviour. Hiding the amounts matched until after the off and only updating the queue information every x seconds would suffice. Clearly that would p1ss a lot of people off but they supposedly want rid of them anyway.
As will the shadows initially Clydebank.Since I started back I've noticed how much worse this has got. It's particularly bad in low liquidity races. I drip feed in e.g. £300 @ 12.0 (presumably I'm not the only one betting it) and a bet suddenly appe
iz77778 13 Jul 11 09:31 feck...bets on an exchange....complains it not a bookie.......
feck.....buys some orange juice....and complains it's not apple.....
feck.....buys a horse....complains it's not a cow......
such is the world of feck.....
iz77778 13 Jul 11 09:31 feck...bets on an exchange....complains it not a bookie.......feck.....buys some orange juice....and complains it's not apple.....feck.....buys a horse....complains it's not a cow......such is the world of feck.....
Plenty of referees out and about yesterday frames. They'd kill for the right to bang their drums in our area but they would never dream of giving a 50:50 decision in their team's favour.
Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with the government of the day should leave the country. Such is the world of izzy and arsfondles.
Plenty of referees out and about yesterday frames. They'd kill for the right to bang their drums in our area but they would never dream of giving a 50:50 decision in their team's favour.Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with the government of the day sho