1.01

Hobson's choice

take it

No [;)]

Or cut the hassle and just bet once at evens, same chance.

Are we to assume you mean 100 winning bets in a row?

Odds would be bigger than Evens i'd say as the ones it is easy to get money on will be poor value for the backer.

of course it can if you play the right markets you can get 100 1.05s in a row only mugs disgagree you need to know how to time it

22 May 11 07:10
Joined:
29 Apr 11
| Topic/replies: 354 | Blogger: -coolio-'s blog
of course it can if you play the right markets you can get 100 1.05s in a row only mugs disgagree you need to know how to time it


Could you tell me the odds on that happening please?

It's possible to get 6 numbers up on the national lottery but it's highly improbable.

Also could you tell me how many times you've got 100 1.05s in a row and how many times you've attempted it?

If ever there was an area where the astute can help themselves to the money of idiots then the very low odds ranges are where it's at.

has any one done 50 in a row

wasn't there another thread on here a while back showing the stats for 1.01 bets being an overall losing strategy - and by implication, laying 1.01 a winning strategy?  That'd explain the huge amounts of available 1.01 to back piled into most markets by layers as soon as they open I guess?

If you're at the front of the queue then laying 1.01 might well be a winning strategy especially in horse racing. But if you're at the back you're probably only being matched when the correct odds are lower than 1.01, and so it becomes a losing strategy.

Some of the things people back for 1.01 amazes me.

Like Arsenal v Liverpool, the 1-1. Who the fcuk backs Arsenal at 1.01 in that situation? And 1.01 horses regularly get busted.

SHORT ODDS BETTING IS ALL ABOUT TIMING IN SPORTS LIKE FOOTY TENNIS CRICKET ETC

BUZZER IM MAKING QUITE A LOW BEATING THE CLOCK AT FOOTBALL SO SUSH LITTLE BOY

so i can take it that not even 50 1.01 shots has been done, coolio if you have any chance you could post as i feel it could be done.