I'm guessing it's perhaps down to the big three? I would usually ask on horseracing, but thats getting as bad as the football forum, and that's saying something...
I'd assume that the reason is specifically due to the fact that bookmakers can now advertise on TV and so the station doesn't want to put off any potential clients by demonstrating the margin by which the punters are being had over.
I'd assume that the reason is specifically due to the fact that bookmakers can now advertise on TV and so the station doesn't want to put off any potential clients by demonstrating the margin by which the punters are being had over.
I think you may have hit the nail on the head Dave. Having said that, if it's a ten runner race I can work it out for myself, however, in a 22 runner handicap, it becomes a bit more of a conundrum when you see after the first twelve in the betting..... 20/1 bar.
I think you may have hit the nail on the head Dave. Having said that, if it's a ten runner race I can work it out for myself, however, in a 22 runner handicap, it becomes a bit more of a conundrum when you see after the first twelve in the betting...
Hard to see why they don't just call their bluff. Can't see any bookies wanting to remove TV Ads.
Anyway most shop punters would have no clue what an overound is . They bet on BAGS Racing ffs . 9/4 9/4 5/2 11/4 7/2 9/2
Hard to see why they don't just call their bluff. Can't see any bookies wanting to remove TV Ads.Anyway most shop punters would have no clue what an overound is . They bet on BAGS Racing ffs . 9/4 9/4 5/2 11/4 7/2 9/2
Because they're in the pockets of their advertisers. Government regulation should require it on all displayed books imo, in the name of consumer protection.
Because they're in the pockets of their advertisers.Government regulation should require it on all displayed books imo, in the name of consumer protection.
FOBT's, Fruit Machines, etc all have their (sub 100%) payout % displayed (I believe it is a legal requirement) and there are still people queueing up to play on them! People still bet on the tote despite the (massive) take out percentage for each respective bet type being known in advance. God bless the ignorant!
I can remember when (on the horses) you could roughly rely on a percentage over round per runner (so big fields had a larger over round than small fields) - alas the industry SP these days seems to generate a bigger over round regardless of field size. The English % over round at the BH meetings yesterday is almost as shameful as the Irish ones - which have always been horrific.
No wonder football with its (relatively speaking) tiny over rounds is gaining in popularity as racing continues to die (the coroner will deliver a verdict of suicide imo!).
FOBT's, Fruit Machines, etc all have their (sub 100%) payout % displayed (I believe it is a legal requirement) and there are still people queueing up to play on them! People still bet on the tote despite the (massive) take out percentage for each res
Tober, nothing wrong with bags racing as long as the on course bookies play fair.
As close to the perfect betting medium as it is possible to get imho. Just a shame that the game is on it's knees.
Tober, nothing wrong with bags racing as long as the on course bookies play fair.As close to the perfect betting medium as it is possible to get imho. Just a shame that the game is on it's knees.