Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
supersavo
31 Jan 11 18:06
Joined:
Date Joined: 19 Apr 02
| Topic/replies: 1,622 | Blogger: supersavo's blog
Is it possible to  predict the price of 0-0 at half-time ( after goal-less 1st half obviously ) based on the pre-match price ?  Is it a straight correlation from the pre-match figure ( ignoring red cards in this example )

Or is it as simple as just looking at what the HT correct score price is for 0-0 ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 34
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 18:21
No it isn't that simple.

As someone else once said, the 0-0 HT shouldn't be more than the SQRT of the 0-0 FT

But to get exact prices you'll have to study a little harder than that  I'm afraid .
By:
diggler
When: 31 Jan 11 18:27
Turkish game on now . pre match 0-0 was 10.5/11 . Half time 0-0 was 2.9 ish. So you could predict that 0-0 would be 3.6 if it stays 0-0 at half time. but as rocket says, it depends how the game is going
By:
Trevh
When: 31 Jan 11 18:33
I think it's roughly correct to look at the HT c/s 0-0, it has to be or huge arbs would occur and the markets aren't that slack.

Rocket, did you mean "the 0-0 HT shouldn't be LESS than the SQRT of the 0-0 FT" ? because as far as I have observed it's nearly always more, i.e.

KO 9.0 = HT 3.3
KO 16.0 = HT 4.5
KO 25.0 = HT 6.0 etc
By:
diggler
When: 31 Jan 11 18:38
trev, i think rocket means in the half time score market , pre match .
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 18:39
Yeah sorry, the SQRT of 0-0 FT should not be less than 0-0 HT

But that is a general rule of thumb and not only will it not give you accurate prices but you'll find that in 99.999999% of cases, the market already knows this and as such it's a useful piece of tit-tat and nothing more.
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 18:40
"Turkish game on now . pre match 0-0 was 10.5/11 . Half time 0-0 was 2.9 ish."
No offence but that's a very poor example, that's not the norm, 2.9 @ ht is very very VERY low, even matches that kick off @ 8s wouldn't normally be that low. I'd expect a 10.5/11 ko to be closer to 4.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 18:46
Christ, I'm confusing myself just typing it.

Right,


The SQRT of 0-0 FT should always be more than 0-0 HT .
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 18:47
It's a moot point though
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:02
I don'tquite  agree rttf, that's not my experience. They're ballpark sqrt but it's not a hard and fast rule.
Let's look at the 6 kick offs now .. oh, API appears absolutely screwed.
By:
Coachbuster
When: 31 Jan 11 19:02
Grin


No, the original answer  ...
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:05
Well 'almost' is the correct answer :) There's a rough calculation that'll give a bit of a guide. Almost :)
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 19:12
What don't you agree with JC ?
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 19:13
p.s it may be hard looking at the 6pm kick offs at... 7:02pm [;)]
By:
supersavo
When: 31 Jan 11 19:15
thanks for the feedback folks, i will do some more work checking out real time matches. As you say, nothing is set in stone, the way the match is panning out will influence prices of course.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 19:16
You won't find an accurate correlation between the two through that method.
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:16
Well no, as of course it was around half time then so we'd have games with odds to look at right there and then, and even if they'd kicked off again, the graphs clearly show half time as it always levels off for a bit due to ht trading :P

What I don't agree with is the odds should be no more than sqrt of full time odds. In my experience, althought I might be wrong, I'm fairly sure it's quite often a little more.
By:
Trevh
When: 31 Jan 11 19:18
No offence but that's a very poor example, that's not the norm, 2.9 @ ht is very very VERY low, even matches that kick off @ 8s wouldn't normally be that low. I'd expect a 10.5/11 ko to be closer to 4.

No way. We must be using different Betfairs's then, perhaps in parallel universes? Most matches at 8.0 won't be anywhere near as high as 2.9, even Augsburg kicking off now is 13.0 / 3.2.
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:22
He's not asking the HT score price, he's asking the FT 0-0 price AT HT, different ;)
By:
supersavo
When: 31 Jan 11 19:23
Yep thats what i meant JC, does get confusing with the 2 separate markets.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 19:25
Bit of confusion here.
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:28
When I first started I assumed the HT 0-0 would be roughly same as FT 0-0 @ HT if still 0-0 as it's two 'equal' halves, but it (unless I AM in a parallel universe, let's not rule that out!) isn't, the 0-0 at HT will be higher by a reasonable bit.

I can only assume more goals are scored second half when 0-0 as legs get tired and players get sloppy, or they get more desperate and less cagey or something?
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 19:29
More goals are scored in the second half, correct.
By:
flatliner
When: 31 Jan 11 19:30
45/55%
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:32
So, after a torturous route, we've finally given the full answer to the OP, and should congratulate ourselves for a job well done Devil.
By:
Trevh
When: 31 Jan 11 19:36
It wasn't me confused, I was responding to JC's post accusing Diggler's post of 18.27 to be wrong. It's actually spot on. JC had confused FT 0-0 at HT of 3.6, with 2.9 HT market.
By:
supersavo
When: 31 Jan 11 19:38
Quite interesting thread with no bitching, that deserves congratulations anyway Laugh
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 19:42
Ahh sorrt trevh I stand corrected. I took "Half time 0-0 was 2.9 ish." as a complete sentence meaning "AT half time, 0-0 was 2.9ish", and obviously didn't read rest of post correctly. I wasn't following game so assumed half time I had been and gone.

I have very VERY rarely seen it @ 2.9 at half time, which is why I responded. Me bad Blush.
By:
Trevh
When: 31 Jan 11 19:59
No worries JC.

I can only assume more goals are scored second half when 0-0 as legs get tired and players get sloppy, or they get more desperate and less cagey or something?

Perversely, backing 0-0 at HT will show a greater profit than backing 0-0 at KO and greening up at HT, which suggests the odds at HT are a little too high across the board.
By:
supersavo
When: 31 Jan 11 20:12
HT now in Augsburg game..

FT 0-0 price is now 4.6/4.7, considerably higher than the HT correct score 0-0 price ( 3.2 )
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 20:16
Assuming you mean the FT price was 4.7 and the HT 3.2 then that looks ok

If not then I am confused. Especially with your opening sentence.
By:
Just Checking
When: 31 Jan 11 20:17
Precisely.
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 20:18
Oooop no wait, we're talking about the FT price at HT


f*ckin hell Laugh
By:
supersavo
When: 31 Jan 11 20:19
yep RTTF - thats what i meant
By:
Rocket to the FACE
When: 31 Jan 11 20:34
looks like we get some free BF points this weekend

shhhhhhh !
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com